Introduction
This working paper provides an analytical contribution to our overall study of region-wide shock responsive social protection initiatives in the Sahel. The Sahel study as a whole is focusing on the role of sub-regional networks and platforms such as the Food Crisis Prevention Network (Réseau de Prévention des Crises Alimentaires) as well as emerging evidence from regional initiatives such as the Global Alliance for Resilience and the Adaptive Social Protection Programme led by the World Bank, among others.It seeks to answer the question of how to envisage integrated social protection systems that are capable of responding to recurrent shocks in the region, particularly the food and nutritional crises that have become quasi structural features of the environment, and for which the response up until now has been largely based on annual humanitarian assistance through targeted household transfers (food, cash, coupons or other inputs).
This paper on community-level practices and perceptions of social protection in the Sahel is organised as follows:
Chapter 2 draws on literature beyond the Sahel to set out the importance of informal social protection systems and mechanisms, examining their functions and exploring their strengths and limitations. It puts forward a ‘social capital’ framework as a means of opening up new ways to conceptualise such mechanisms, and to assess and support their capacity to respond to both idiosyncratic and covariate shocks.
Chapter 3 identifies a diversity of local informal social protection systems and mechanisms that have been documented in the Sahel, highlighting their specific strengths as well as assessing the particular challenges that these mechanisms face in response to idiosyncratic and covariate shocks. The chapter suggests how ongoing efforts to strengthen ‘shock-responsive’ social protection could usefully focus on developing complementarity between formal and informal systems.
Chapter 4 focuses attention on pastoralists as a relatively neglected and marginalised group in the Sahel. Pastoralists’ livelihood and risk-management strategies represent one the most adaptive responses to the shocks and stresses of an arid environment, but they find themselves increasingly vulnerable in the face of changing circumstances. This chapter argues that shock responsive social protection programmes must be tailored to the particular contours of pastoral livelihoods and well-being.
Chapter 5 presents and discusses some of the key findings emerging from recent studies of community responses to seasonal cash transfer programmes in selected Sahelian countries.
These findings highlight in graphic detail some of the social complexities arising from this new form of assistance. The chapter focuses in particular on ambiguities arising from selective household targeting within a culture of broader community solidarity.
Chapter 6 summarises the key findings of the analysis, and suggests that further reflection on ‘shock-responsive’ social protection in the Sahel needs to be built into ongoing efforts to develop overall systems that can span the continuum from protection, prevention, promotion and transformation, converging thus within an increasingly important agenda around resilience.