Are you the publisher? Claim or contact us about this channel

Embed this content in your HTML


Report adult content:

click to rate:

Account: (login)

More Channels


Channel Catalog

Channel Description:

ReliefWeb - Updates

older | 1 | .... | 439 | 440 | (Page 441) | 442 | 443 | .... | 728 | newer

    0 0

    Source: Famine Early Warning System Network
    Country: Burkina Faso

    Le mil, le maïs et le sorgho sont les produits alimentaires les plus importants pour la consommation ménagère. Le mil est le produit de base des ménages les plus vulnérables, tandis que le maïs et le sorgho contribuent aussi au panier alimentaire de la majorité des autres ménages. Le marché de Sankaryare est le plus vaste et le plus important de Ouagadougou; il approvisionne d’autres marchés du pays et dans la région. Koudougou se trouve dans l'une des régions les plus peuplées du pays, où une majorité des ménages dépend du marché pour son ravitaillement alimentaire. Djibo se situe dans la zone sahélienne, hautement vulnérable. Pouytenga est un marché de regroupement pour les produits du Nigeria, du Ghana, du Bénin et du Togo. Solenzo est un marché rural situé au milieu d’une zone de production excédentaire. Bobo Dioulasso est un important centre tant pour la consommation que pour la production : elle fait office de capitale économique du BurkinaFaso et se trouve dans une importante zone de production céréalière.

    0 0

    Source: Famine Early Warning System Network
    Country: Burkina Faso

    Key Messages

    • The agricultural season began poorly throughout the country, significantly delaying planting, particularly for long-cycle crops such as cotton and traditional varieties of millet and sorghum. The season is characterized by below-average to average rainfall that has been poorly distributed in terms of time and space.

    • In the northern areas of the country (communes of Tin-Akoff, Nassoumbou, and Koutougou), Crisis (IPC Phase 3) food insecurity would persist if not for assistance in the area. Pastoralists are still reporting significant losses of livestock due to pasture shortages. In addition, deteriorating livestock-to-cereal terms of trade is limiting poor households' access to adequate food supplies.

    • On the markets, staple cereal and livestock prices are following average seasonal trends, but could rise significantly if the progression of the growing season leads to doubts about its results. However, cereal availability will remain generally satisfactory thanks to above-average trader stock levels.

    0 0

    Source: Famine Early Warning System Network
    Country: Burkina Faso

    Livestock and crops in favorable condition despite poor start to the rainy season

    Key Messages

    • Household food security has improved since last month with harvests of seasonal products such as sorrel, bean, and baobab leaves, maize, early groundnuts, as well as green millet in certain areas. Subsidized cereal sales are also underway.

    • Staple food prices, down 3 percent for maize and stable for sorghum and millet compared to the five-year average, are favorable for poor, market-dependent households.

    • Following the pastoral lean season, regeneration and replenishment of food and water sources for livestock have significantly improved livestock body conditions.

    • Humanitarian assistance programs in the northern agro-pastoral zone (communes of Nassoumbou, Koutougou, and Tin-Akoff) are continuing despite the ongoing political-military crisis and remain in Stressed (IPC Phase 2!). Unless the security situation deteriorates significantly, no impacts on food security are expected during the outlook period. Minimal (IPC Phase 1) outcomes are anticipated between October and December 2015. FEWS NET will continue to monitor the situation.

    For more detailed analysis, see the July to December 2015 Food Security Outlook for Burkina Faso.

    0 0

    Source: UN High Commissioner for Refugees
    Country: Afghanistan, Algeria, Austria, Bangladesh, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, France, Gambia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Hungary, Iraq, Italy, Libya, Mali, Malta, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, occupied Palestinian territory, Senegal, Serbia, Somalia, Spain, Sudan, Sweden, Syrian Arab Republic, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Tunisia, Turkey, World

    Refugee emergency in Europe: UNHCR appeals for USD 128 million

    This year, over half a million people, the majority of them refugees, have crossed the Mediterranean Sea in search of safety in Europe. European countries have been struggling to deal with this influx of refugees and migrants. To respond to this emergency, UNHCR established a Special Mediterranean Initiative (SMI) and is working closely with the European Union and its member states, as well as with other countries in Europe, Africa and the Middle East affected by ongoing conflict and forced displacement of populations.

    UNHCR revised today its appeal for funding for the SMI in 2015 and 2016. The total financial requirements from June 2015 to December 2016 now amount to USD 128 million. This Supplementary Appeal includes activities in Europe but also incorporates programmes in countries of asylum or transit in the Middle East and Africa.

    UNHCR is planning for up to 700,000 people seeking safety and international protection in Europe in 2015. While it is difficult to estimate at this point, it is possible that there could be even greater numbers of arrivals in 2016. Planning is based for the moment on similar figures to 2015.

    In light of the fast-evolving situation in Europe, and the need to move resources from one location to another in response to the flow of people currently seeking international protection in the region, UNHCR is appealing to donors to provide contributions that can be allocated as flexibly as possible.


    Over the past months, ever-increasing numbers of people, the majority of whom are fleeing war, violence and persecution, have been risking their lives to cross the Mediterranean Sea and take other dangerous routes in search of safety in Europe. European States bordering the Mediterranean Sea, the Western Balkans and other European countries have been struggling to deal with this influx of refugees and migrants.

    UNHCR has established a Special Mediterranean Initiative in order to find solutions to both the causes and effects of these movements, and is working closely with the European Union and its Member States, as well as with other affected States in Europe, in North Africa, West Africa, the East and Horn of Africa and, beyond the framework of this Initiative, with countries in the Middle East affected by ongoing conflict and forced displacement of populations.

    This Supplementary Appeal presents a consolidated picture of known or estimated requirements to date for the implementation of UNHCR’s Special Mediterranean Initiative in 2015 and 2016. It includes a summary of requirements identified after the issuance on 8 September 2015 of the Emergency Appeal Initial Response Plan for the Refugee Crisis in Europe (June 2015 – December 2016)1 and now also incorporates activities for implementation in countries of asylum or transit in the Middle East and North Africa in West Africa and in the East and Horn of Africa. It also recognizes that, to be effective, there is a need to implement a range of activities in countries of origin, first asylum, transit and destination, given the complexity.

    It should be noted that this appeal presents current needs in Africa and the North Africa subregion for which UNHCR has already planned responses in the affected countries within its programmes for 2015 and 2016. These responses complement UNHCR’s existing efforts within the inter-agency strategic framework for the Syria crisis – the Regional Refugee and Resilience Plan 2015-2016 in Response to the Syria Crisis (3RP) for Syrian refugees and the Syria Humanitarian Assistance Response Plan (SHARP) for inside Syria - as well as other relevant inter-agency humanitarian appeals such as the Humanitarian Response Plan for Libya.

    By August 2015, the situation in Europe had reached a level of urgency and complexity that warranted an enhancement of UNHCR’s internal management and coordination structure. Consequently, the High Commissioner designated the Director of the Regional Bureau for Europe as Regional Refugee Coordinator (RRC) for this crisis. The RRC is leading UNHCR’s response to this emergency in Europe, ensuring a comprehensive approach that covers all affected countries and is closely coordinated with the European Union response. By late September, almost 500,000 refugees and migrants have arrived on European Mediterranean shores, close to 80 per cent of whom originate from the world’s top 10 refugee-producing countries. Over 50 per cent of the new arrivals are Syrians. In the course of the year, the movements have taken place in three broad phases:

    A. Until May, the movements occurred mainly by boat across the Central Mediterranean, principally to Italy and then onwards, mainly to Germany and Sweden.

    B. By June and July, while movements through the Central Mediterranean corridor continued at a similar pace as in 2014, there was a significant increase in the number of refugees and migrants transiting through or exiting Turkey by boat to Greece and then moving onwards through the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Serbia to European Union States in Western and Northern Europe. The shift towards the Turkey-Greece crossing was already noticeable towards the end of 2014, with lower numbers of Syrian nationals crossing from Libya.

    C. In the most recent phase, since August the overwhelming majority of the new arrivals have been charting their way through various countries in Southern and South-Eastern Europe to seek asylum in Western and Northern Europe.

    Lacking legal avenues to reach Europe, refugees have continued to move alongside migrants, using the same routes and means and facing similar risks and dangers. Among the factors behind the increased movement to Europe, refugees have indicated the loss of hope, high costs of living leading to deepening poverty, limited livelihood opportunities, and aid shortfalls. Confronted with increasingly restrictive and unpredictable border control measures in regions of origin and transit, many fall prey to smugglers, with trafficking also being reported along routes in West Africa, the East and Horn of Africa, as well as in transit through Libya. Despite increased naval patrols, especially in the Central Mediterranean corridor, over 2,900 people have been reported dead or missing at sea in 2015, and many more are likely to have perished.

    The rapidly changing scenarios in respect of routes and movements towards western and northern European countries have complicated the responses, and efforts to devise an EU-wide approach, which UNHCR is actively supporting, have been slow. The announcements by the European Commission in the week of 21 September are a welcome sign of greater coordination and determination by Governments to tackle this enormous humanitarian challenge, even though broader political and economic issues continue to be debated. Of particular relevance is the approved plan for the relocation of asylum-seekers within Europe.

    UNHCR is aware that other organizations may launch their own appeal/response plan to the current situation and is closely coordinating at the field level with other agencies and organizations on the various components of a multi-faceted response.

    In light of the fast-evolving situation in Europe, and the need to move resources from one location to another in response to the flow of people currently seeking international protection in the region, UNHCR is appealing to donors to provide contributions that can be allocated as flexibly as possible across the region.

    Population data

    UNHCR is planning for up to 700,000 people seeking safety and international protection in Europe in 2015. The planning figures have thus increased by 350,000 in 2015 in comparison to the initial figures reflected in the emergency appeal. While it is difficult to estimate at this point, it is possible that there could be even greater numbers of arrivals in 2016, however planning is based for the moment on similar figures to 2015.

    UNHCR’s activities in sub-Saharan Africa for addressing the protection risks of refugees and migrants moving irregularly will target more than 208,000 people in 2015 and 236,000 people in 2016.

    For the purposes of this Appeal, the North Africa subregion has a planning figure of 27,000 people in 2015 and 55,000 people in 2016. This response complements UNHCR’s efforts within the interagency strategic framework for the Syria crisis – the 3RP for Syrian refugees and the SHARP for inside Syria - as well as other relevant inter-agency humanitarian appeals such as the Humanitarian Response Plan for Libya. The vast majority of Syrian refugees are transiting through Turkey, for which corresponding needs are presented in the Europe chapter of this Appeal.

    0 0

    Source: Famine Early Warning System Network
    Country: Mauritania

    L’insécurité alimentaire en baisse dans la majeure partie du pays

    Key Messages:

    La pluviométrie pendant la saison des pluies de 2015/16 étaient suffisante et bien repartie dans le temps qui a permis un développement normal des pâturages et des cultures pluviales. Ces deux facteurs positifs offriront aux ménages pauvres une disponibilité alimentaire meilleure que celle de 2014 pendant l’année de consommation de 2015/16.

    Les prix des animaux affichent des hausses significatives comparativement à l’année précédente à la même période. Il en découle que les termes d'échange vont progressivement en faveur des éleveurs. Ce renforcement des prix des animaux dans la majeure partie des zones de moyens d’existence offre la capacité d’accès alimentaire et réduit l’insécurité alimentaire entre septembre et décembre 2015 aux niveaux Minimale (Phase 1 de l’IPC) ou Stress (Phase 2 de l’IPC) selon la zone.

    0 0

    Source: IRIN
    Country: Nigeria

    Is Nigeria attempting the impossible in trying to de-radicalise Boko Haram militants? IRIN’s Editor-at-Large Obi Anyadike speaks to the prisoners, their victims, and the de-rad “treatment teams” trying to reintegrate them into society. He explores what drove the men to join an insurgency that is tearing the region apart.

    Prison officer Malam Tata has a calling. He sees it as his religious duty to help people reach salvation, and believes few have erred as grievously as the 43 Boko Haram militants under his care in Kuje Prison, on the outskirts of the Nigerian capital, Abuja.

    Tata has spent 26 years in the prison service. He leads a team of imams, Muslim religious leaders, in a unique, homegrown de-radicalisation strategy aimed at rehabilitating the Boko Haram inmates. His team, all prison officers, has the most intimate contact with the group, leading them in daily spiritual discussions that question the basis of their ideology of violence.

    “Some of them are illiterate. They can’t even cite the Qur’an, yet they say they are doing jihad,” says Tata, a cheerful, trim-looking officer. “Some of them are learned. They have read the Qur’an and the Hadith, but they don’t really understand Islam. Satan has whispered in their ear.”

    Kuje, a medium-security facility, is the testbed of Nigeria’s prison-based countering violent extremism (CVE) programme, launched in March. At its heart is the idea of “treating” the men on terrorism-related charges: that through activities like therapy, sport, schooling and vocational training, their behaviour can be modified; the risk of them recruiting while inside reduced; and eventually they can be reintegrated into society.

    Building a bond between the “treatment team” and the Boko Haram inmates, officially known as “clients”, is seen as crucial to the success of the CVE strategy. Tata talks in patriotic terms about why he joined the team, and his belief that in doing God’s work, he earns a spiritual reward.

    That offers some comfort. “These are very, very dangerous people. Anything can happen. We know they communicate with their people on the outside,” he reminds me.

    Tata has personal experience of the risks: he was wounded during an attack on a prison by Boko Haram, although he refuses to talk about it. He believes the military tide has turned and now the insurgents are on the run. The “clients” in Kuje “know they are losing,” he says. “They watch TV.”

    The day I visit the prison, Arsenal is playing Chelsea in Kuje’s version of the Champions League: both prison teams lustily supported, the cheers floating over the yard wall.

    But my destination is the “de-rad” wing, a quieter, more secluded set of modern classrooms, originally planned as an open university. Unlike the rest of the austere prison, there is even air-conditioning.

    I sit down in a small room with one of the “clients”. The stocky man on the other side of the desk wears jeans and a tight t-shirt. He has an Afro, a scraggly beard and a large ring on his finger. He calls himself a commander, but looks more like a guy you might see in a club. He speaks in Hausa, the lingua franca of the north, in short sentences, finishing each thought with a “tell him” to the imam who is translating – eager for his story to be understood.

    Halfway through the interview, the “commander,” who doesn’t want to reveal his name, pauses. The imam has a cold so he leans forward and asks whether he wants the air-conditioning turned off. It seems a genuine, solicitous moment.

    He sees himself as a transformed man, which he ascribes to Tata and his team. When asked during the interview where the Qur’an justifies killing civilians, the commander repeatedly says he can’t remember. It becomes clear that he doesn’t want to explore that old frame of mind. “I’ve changed. I don’t want to talk about justification.” The imam suggests we move on.

    Ferdinand Ikwang heads the national de-rad programme, which falls under the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA). In his portfolio is a web of interlinked projects tackling the economic and social triggers of recruitment, as well as laying the groundwork for a disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration (DDR) effort once Boko Haram is defeated or a peace agreement is reached.

    He has a robust position on the men that have taken up violence. Those who have committed atrocities will stay in prison under de-rad. But the low-level footsoldiers who have gone through CVE will be considered for release and allowed “to continue with their lives”, albeit under surveillance.

    The yardstick is not whether they drop their beliefs, but whether they are likely to “pick up a gun”, says Ikwang.

    Kuje is not the only prison holding Boko Haram inmates. Agwata, near the eastern city of Onitsha, has roughly 100 who surrendered earlier this year, and de-rad is about to start there as well, staffed by officers trained in Kuje. There are other ONSA facilities filling up as Boko Haram start to lay down their weapons in increasing numbers.

    Participation in de-rad is voluntary. In Kuje, four inmates have chosen not to join the treatment programme for apparently practical rather than ideological reasons: they are contesting the government’s accusation that they are members of the group.

    Most of the 39 other “clients” – all on remand – have been in detention for the past four years, although not always in Kuje, and when in the hands of the security services, not under the most humane of conditions.

    The benefits of joining de-rad are clear: firstly, most get to live in segregated cells with a single double-bunk, a far cry from the conditions in the rest of the prison, opened in 1989 as an 80-bed facility, but which currently holds 910 prisoners.

    They have a refurbished wing to themselves, funded by the European Union, where their structured daily activities are held. They have basics like toilet paper and soap. It’s a level of care unheard of in Nigeria's under-funded prisons, where the word rehabilitation is rarely voiced.

    “The cardinal objective of the programme is not to force anyone to join. It’s to get voluntary buy-in,” says Kasali Yusuf, coordinator of the joint ONSA/prison service team in Kuje. “They may initially join just for the privileges, which do tend to soften their hearts.”

    But with Boko Haram inmates already deeply unpopular among the general prison population, “the special privileges lead to rancour and have been a challenge for us. We’ve had to explain [to the other prisoners] that it’s funded by a special [EU] programme,” says Yusuf.

    Yusuf’s boss, the manager of the “treatment team,” is psychologist Dr Wahaab Akorede. After reviewing the case studies of the 43 clients, he concludes that what differentiates them from the run-of-the-mill criminals he’s used to dealing with is their level of anger, their desire to “smash everything”.

    It suggests they themselves are “victims of trauma”: so desperate, with so little opportunity, they are ready to trust that paradise is their reward for martyrdom.

    Neither Akorede nor Yusuf – both Muslims and senior prison officers – see much evidence of deep religiosity among many of the men in the treatment programme.

    Instead, Akorede ticks off other potential triggers: polygamous families where wives compete for their husband’s affection to the detriment of the children; an Islam, as traditionally taught in the north, that leaves young men ill-prepared for the modern workplace; and the callousness of successive governments that has consigned so many to suffering and an early death, “to the point where God must be tired of seeing Nigerians”.

    “Alienation” is his preferred explanation for Boko Haram’s appeal. These are mostly men with little formal education, with hand-to-mouth jobs on the urban margins, “looked down upon even by Muslims in their own community as riff-raff”. They are angry, “and religion is the platform to vent that anger”.

    Akorede divides the men in Kuje into two groups – the “big fish” and the followers. “The big fish are the smart ones. They know how to manipulate people. They say, ‘Your religion is special and it’s under threat’.” In effect they create a cult, in which everyone – including the religious and traditional establishment – are the enemy.

    And where an appeal to religion and martyrdom is not enough, Boko Haram offers aid to your family. “So here’s a man that is not happy within himself. He has not been given an opportunity to be educated. He has no future. If you give him 10,000 naira [$50], he will carry that bomb,” says Akorede.

    The "commander" smiles when asked the date he joined Boko Haram. The sect was founded in 2002 by a young cleric, Mohammed Yusuf, and took root in the northeastern city of Maiduguri, the heart of a region that has been at the centre of Islamic learning for centuries.

    But the commander’s radicalism predates the movement. “I was Boko Haram before Boko Haram existed,” he boasts, using the group’s official name, “Jama'atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda'awati wal-Jihad” (People Committed to the Propagation of the Prophet's Teachings and Jihad).

    He was a member of the Nigerian Taliban (“Al sunna wal Jamma”), which had recruited mujahedeen to fight in Afghanistan. The group had been preaching jihad, or holy struggle, and had attacked police stations and government buildings along the northeastern border with Cameroon through much of 2004, before Yusuf began to talk of violent resistance to Nigeria’s secular state.

    The Taliban, among them university graduates from the University of Maiduguri, along with some of Yusuf’s more radical followers, were routed when their camp was attacked by the army in northeastern Yobe State. But the commander was not among them – he had thrown in with Yusuf, who at the time was building a grassroots movement that senior political leaders in Maiduguri were keen to cultivate.

    The commander comes from “a family that valued education”. But he was rebellious and quit school early, going into business with a grinding mill in his hometown of Biu. When his father found out, he threw him out of the house. And so the commander began to gravitate towards Islam, ending up in a madrassa in neighbouring Adamawa State run by a Pakistani sheikh.

    Nigeria was in ferment at the time over the issue of Shariah Law. Its introduction by 12 predominantly Islamic northern states in 2000 was driven by a demand from the Muslim street for an egalitarian antidote to the venality and corruption of Nigerian life. But instead, an elite-serving “political Shariah” stopped any real reform, and as a result, the northern establishment came to be seen as the target by some radicals.

    “It was easy to attract youths. They were eager to hear about jihad,” says the commander. Part of the reason is the traditional Almajirai system, under which millions of young boys in the north are still schooled. They are attached to a Qur’anic teacher (who doesn’t always have a firm understanding of the text) to learn by rote for years, supporting themselves and their mentor by begging.

    It has left the north educationally disadvantaged, with a simmering street-level militancy.

    Nigeria’s northeast has the worst social indicators in the country. A tradition of northern progressive movements existed up until the 1980s to champion the rights of the "talakawa" (commoners) against the feudal conservative establishment seen as responsible for their poverty, but nowadays populist resistance against injustice is much more likely to be religiously grounded.

    The confrontation between Boko Haram and the authorities exploded in July 2009. Yusuf had fallen out with the Borno State government and, after the killing of a group of his followers, he promised revenge. His men attacked police stations and government buildings in four northern states. In days of fighting, 700 people died, including Yusuf, killed while in police custody in Maiduguri.

    The commander, who fled to the northern city of Kano and laid low until his capture, draws a distinction between the early days of Boko Haram, and the extreme violence of the group under Yusuf’s successor, Abubakar Shekau, a war-time leader seen as more lethal than learned, who made common cause with the global jihadist movement.

    “I don’t know how it happened. In all the towns they capture, they kill the people. Who are you going to rule? That’s what I don’t understand,” says the commander. More than 25,000 people have died in Boko Haram-related violence both inside Nigeria and across its borders – the vast majority fellow Muslims.

    Tata has lined up another “client” for me to talk to, a slight man in glasses with a neatly trimmed beard and a clean white dashiki, or tunic. He speaks reverentially about what he regards as Yusuf’s integrity and “truthfulness”. His explanation for Boko Haram’s emergence is that Nigerian society needed to be cleansed of corruption, injustice and homosexuality.

    He’d been part of Yusuf’s cabinet or “shura,” and says that before he was caught in 2011 he led Boko Haram in three states: Bauchi, Gombe and Plateau. He accuses the authorities of unwarranted aggression, exemplified by the bulldozing of the group’s sprawling Markaz mosque complex after the Maiduguri uprising, and the extrajudicial killing of Yusuf, for which no policeman has been convicted.

    If anybody epitomises Akorede’s thesis on the dangers of frustrated, angry individuals, it is this intense man.

    He was one of “38 or 40” siblings, and although he completed primary school, he dropped out of secondary school around the age of 12. He became an electrical car mechanic in Maiduguri, but the poverty of the north and the indifference of the wealthy stirred him. “I believed if you were ready to use violence, you could achieve your aims,” he says.

    He doesn’t talk about where he fought or what he did, simply saying: “Before this programme, I would have no time for you. There would be no jokes. I was hard. Now I realise it’s important to listen and share views.”

    Ahmed Musa is weeping, his face buried in the crook of his arm. He is a member of the Civilian Joint Task Force (CJTF), a vigilante group that emerged in 2013 in support of the army to drive Boko Haram out of Maiduguri. But Ahmed’s two brothers were both militants. The youngest one “I loved so very much,” he says.

    He tried to get him interested in his small business, to turn him away from militancy, “but he never stayed”. Instead, his youngest brother approached him with a group of men and asked him to keep some weapons for them. Ahmed had recently joined CJTF and heard his brother had put his name on a kill list. The arms storage request was his last chance.

    Instead, Ahmed led a group from the task force to arrest his brother and hand him over to the army – an almost certain death sentence. “I tied him up,” says Ahmed, the anguish still raw. “I promised that I would not let anybody live in this society that was Boko Haram.”

    He’s unsure if his elder brother is still alive but knows he was involved in an attack on 33 Artillery Barrack in Maiduguri in 2013. He’d been a reluctant Boko Haram recruit, initiated by a friend who sold petrol on the black market. Initially, he’d just kept arms for the group, “but gradually they showed him how to fire [the weapons], and then how to cut necks [of captives].”

    It's just after midday prayer in Maiduguri, and I’m in an area called Monday Market where Mohammed Yusuf initially used to preach. It is here he made his declaration of war against the Nigerian state in June 2009, when Maiduguri was a thriving city, the centre of a livestock-based economy with trade networks extending as far as Sudan and Central African Republic.

    I’m talking to a couple of men about what gave birth to Boko Haram, and others are joining the conversation, eager to distance the city from the violence and bloodshed that followed.

    But Suleiman Aliyu, a headmaster, admits there was support for Boko Haram in the community. In their simple traditional clothing, the hem of their trousers above the ankle, the movement’s members were seen as pious and disciplined. Their anti-corruption message resonated; some of their wealthy followers, swept up by the millennial zeitgeist, donated lavishly. “If you didn’t think deeply, you followed them,” he says.

    When the insurrection was suppressed, Boko Haram scattered. But an infusion of cash from jihadists in Algeria and Mali allowed them to regroup and return in 2010. An early ban by the state government on motorbike taxis, often used in ride-by shootings, meant an estimated 34,000 people lost their livelihoods – driving yet more recruits to the group.

    An inept counter-insurgency operation by the army, imposing collective punishment on neighbourhoods in response to attacks, further tested people’s loyalty. Meanwhile, Boko Haram splashed cash: it would “solve your needs”, whether it was money for a wedding or a naming ceremony, its members “wanted to draw you in” – and killed you if you resisted.

    “They wanted to take charge of everything in the community,” says Aliyu. The rise of the vigilante Civilian JTF – armed with just machetes and axes – was a brave, desperate response to the terror the group imposed. These men provided the army with the eyes and ears that allowed it to drive Boko Haram from Maiduguri by the end of 2013, and largely keep it out.

    Few people in Maiduguri admit to relatives joining Boko Haram, but Mohammed Garima is ready to talk. His 25-year-old nephew joined the group and he’s still trying to understand why.

    “Poverty is maybe [one reason],” he says. The young man was a roadside puncture repairer, known as vulcanisers, probably earning around $5 a day. “But there was something else. He was always isolating himself from people, always pretending to be more religious than everyone else.”

    Garima had himself heard Yusuf preach, and wasn’t impressed. “He condemned everything: the roads, social services, education, the hospitals, things we use – things he used – and there was little in what he said that was spiritual.”

    In 2009, his nephew disappeared and the family realised he had joined Boko Haram. He periodically kept in touch, and when his grandmother died last year, his father demanded that he visit. While in town, he was recognised and arrested, and Garima heard that he had died in detention in Maiduguri’s Kainji air force base.

    There is unanimous conviction among the people I speak to in Maiduguri that mirrors the position of the de-rad programme: there can be no reintegration for the most hardcore Boko Haram. “They appear in human form, but really they are devils,” says one man who asked not to be named.

    “This person killed your mother or father, burned your house; how can you live with them? It’s not possible,” adds Garima. He is slightly more conciliatory towards those coerced to join. There could be an amnesty in those cases, “but they will have to be taken to another state, otherwise people will take revenge,” he says.

    According to Ikwang, the head of the de-rad programme, but also a DDR specialist and lecturer at the British Defence Academy in Shrivenham, those allowed back into society will be in “halfway houses” and monitored. They will be grouped into cooperatives based on vocational skills where counselling will be mandatory.

    Community acceptance is essential. “If you’re returning say 400 ex-combatants to the community, you have to engage the community. If it’s 400 [ex-Boko Haram] in, then you need to find places for 400 local youths in government programmes, otherwise the host community will scream and say they are going to kill them,” says Ikwang.

    But considering the poor track record of previous Nigerian governments in rolling out medium-term programmes, ring-fencing the funding, and spending appropriately, what’s to prevent de-rad from collapsing into scandal and waste? Akorede’s response is a dogged “we have no choice” but to keep it alive.

    There is a more fundamental question: does de-radicalisation actually work? Certainly the de-rad wing in Kuje does not feel threatening, which is in the interests of both staff and detainees. The treatment team wear civilian clothes and mix and talk freely with the “clients”, a novelty for some used to jails where inmates must squat before they can address an officer.

    “The challenge has been to enter the hearts and minds of the extremists,” says Ekpedeme Udom, in charge of all prison-based CVE. “This is a first in Africa, and we’re having exceptional results.” But as a senior prison manager, she is shrewdly aware a battle of wits plays out daily between “clients” and treatment staff inside Kuje, with both sides looking to advance their interests.

    Udom is part of a new generation of reform-minded prison officers. She was “given a clean sheet” to develop the Kuje programme on behalf of ONSA, drawing on and adapting CVE approaches used in Asia and the Middle East.

    De-radicalisation requires huge investment, from training staff to upgrading facilities and funding post-release programmes. But the literature is unclear on recidivism rates, and whether indeed they are the right gauge. Part of the problem, is that “it’s too early to tell,” says Udom. “CVE has only been going for something like 10 years in the rest of the world.”

    But Ikwang worries about a more systemic problem, rooted in Nigeria’s appalling record of governance that Boko Haram – and other simmering conflicts across the country – has fed on. “All extremism is an ideology that has to be dealt with at the grassroots, starting even in kindergarten, with the government being far more responsive and responsible to its citizenry,” he warns, pausing in reflection.

    “How have we lost this generation of children?”


    0 0

    Source: International Crisis Group
    Country: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, China, Colombia, Côte d'Ivoire, Cyprus, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Ethiopia, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Israel, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Madagascar, Mali, Mexico, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, occupied Palestinian territory, Pakistan, Philippines, Russian Federation, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), World, Yemen, Zimbabwe

    September 2015 – Trends

    • Deteriorated situations
      Afghanistan, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Central African Republic, Mozambique, Somalia, Syria, Tajikistan, Turkey, Yemen

    • Improved situations
      Colombia, Guatemala, Macedonia

    October 2015 – Watchlist

    • Conflict risk alerts
      Afghanistan, Burkina Faso, Central African Republic

    • Conflict resolution opportunities

    0 0

    Source: Agence France-Presse
    Country: Mali

    Nations unies, Etats-Unis | AFP | jeudi 01/10/2015 - 23:30 GMT

    Le trafic de drogue est un "problème majeur" qui nourrit le conflit et entrave l'application du processus de paix au Mali, a estimé jeudi le chef de la diplomatie malienne Abdoulaye Diop, en marge de l'Assemblée générale de l'ONU.

    "Le trafic de drogue est, avec le terrorisme, l'un des obstacles majeurs à l'application de l'accord de paix. C'est vraiment un problème majeur, car il nourrit le conflit, finance les organisations terroristes et déstabilise le pays", a déclaré M. Diop à l'issue d'une rencontre consacrée au Mali à l'ONU.

    "Nous devons combattre également les terroristes et les narco-trafiquants, sinon nous ne réussirons pas à avoir une paix durable au Mali", a-t-il ajouté.

    Trois mois après le parachèvement d'un accord de paix entre le gouvernement de Bamako et les groupes armés du Nord, l'instabilité perdure dans la partie septentrionale du pays, miné par les rivalités tribales, les luttes d'influence et les trafics, y compris entre groupes signataires.

    "Il y a eu des débuts très difficiles de l'application de l'accord", a reconnu M. Diop, "mais il y a aussi quelques bonnes nouvelles".

    "Un comité de suivi de l'accord est opérationnel et travaille au quotidien. Sur le terrain, les écoles ont rouvert à Tombouctou et à Gao. A Kidal, elles vont ouvrir le 15 octobre, après avoir été fermées pendant trois ans. Malgré les défis, le processus est en marche", a-t-il déclaré.

    De son côté, le chef des opérations de maintien de la paix, Hervé Ladsous, a réitéré "l'engagement sans faille de la communauté internationale" aux côtés du Mali. "Le processus de paix est une occasion historique et il doit se poursuivre", a-t-il déclaré.

    Le nord du Mali était tombé en mars-avril 2012 sous la coupe de groupes jihadistes liés à Al-Qaïda, après la déroute de l'armée face à la rébellion à dominante touareg. Ces jihadistes ont été en grande partie chassés à la suite du lancement en janvier 2013, à l'initiative de la France, d'une intervention militaire internationale, qui se poursuit actuellement. Mais des zones entières échappent encore au contrôle des forces maliennes et étrangères.


    © 1994-2015 Agence France-Presse

    0 0

    Source: Agence France-Presse
    Country: Mali

    United Nations, United States | AFP | Thursday 10/1/2015 - 23:55 GMT

    Drug trafficking is a major problem fueling the conflict in Mali and impeding the peace process, the country's foreign minister said Thursday on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly.

    "Drug trafficking is really a major concern," Foreign Minister Abdoulaye Diop told reporters after a UN meeting on Mali.

    "It fuels the conflict, funds the terrorist organizations and it destabilize the country so all these are interlinked," he said.

    The minister said drug trafficking went hand in hand with terror attacks as the two big impediments to implementing the peace agreement.

    "Unless we tackle seriously these issues we'll not succeed in having a lasting peace in Mali," he said.

    Three months after reaching a peace deal designed to end decades of conflict in northern Mali, stability remains an elusive dream undermined by tribal rivalries and internecine power struggles.

    "There were very difficult beginnings," admitted Diop "but there is also some good news."

    He said a committee overseeing the agreement was working daily, and on the ground schools had reopened in Timbuktu and Gao. They would also reopen in Kidal on October 15 after being closed three years.

    "Despite the challenges, the process is working," he said.

    The head of UN peacekeeping, Herve Ladsous, reiterated "the unwavering committment of the international community" to Mali. "The peace process is an historic opportunity and must continue," he said.

    Jihadist groups linked to Al-Qaeda seized control of Mali's vast arid north from March 2012 until January 2013 when they were pushed back by forces from France, the country's former colonial master.

    But parts of the remote north remain out of the control of the army or of the UN military mission as the country struggles to restore peace.

    There were hopes of a return to stability in May when northern-based loyalist militias signed a peace deal with Tuareg rebels in the area, but the deal remains fragile.


    © 1994-2015 Agence France-Presse

    0 0

    Source: UN News Service
    Country: Mali

    1 October 2015 – Noting the progress that has been made to date to secure stability in Mali, the United Nations Deputy Secretary-General today urged all parties to adhere to the peace accord signed earlier this year, while also stressing the need to address development challenges.

    “This ministerial meeting must send a strong message to the signatory parties, particularly to the political-military movements,” Jan Eliasson told participants at a gathering at UN Headquarters aimed at continuing to build international support for the country’s peace process and the implementation of the June 2015 Agreement for Peace and Reconciliation in Mali.

    “They must renounce all actions which violate the Agreement and the ceasefire. They must also commit to resolving their differences through the mechanisms envisaged in the Agreement, and implement its provisions related to defence and security,” Mr. Eliasson added.

    He also cited the need for the Government to carry out the institutional reforms envisaged in the Agreement, which was concluded with the help of an Algeria-led mediation team, saying that this will strengthen the confidence of the signatory parties and the northern communities in the peace process.

    In addition, the protection of human rights and the fight against impunity are critical for restoring public confidence in State institutions. It is also essential that the Agreement’s follow-up mechanisms become more open to representation by women.

    Despite positive developments on the ground, the situation in Mali has long remained a challenge. The country's Government has been seeking to restore stability and rebuild following a series of setbacks since early 2012, including a military coup d'état, renewed fighting between Government forces and Tuareg rebels, and the seizure of its northern territory by radical Islamists. In addition, the country has been consumed by a series of humanitarian crises.

    Throughout much of this time, Mali's north has remained restive. The UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission (MINUSMA), which is tasked with supporting the implementation of the Agreement, as well as protecting civilians under imminent threat of physical violence, among other things, have come under repeated violent attack.

    Mr. Eliasson paid tribute to the important efforts of MINUSMA and the UN country team “to quickly generate peace dividends for the Malian population.”

    “I often stress the undeniable links between peace and security, development and human rights,” he stated. “I would like the combination of our actions in the coming months to strengthen these three factors for the Malian people – and in the interest of the sub-region.”

    0 0

    Source: UN Security Council
    Country: Iraq, Japan, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Mali, occupied Palestinian territory, Serbia, Syrian Arab Republic, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Turkey, Ukraine, World


    7527th Meeting (AM)

    Rampant instability and terrorism in the Middle East and North Africa could only be stemmed through a united, comprehensive approach that addressed root causes, speakers stressed to the Security Council today in an all-day high-level open debate presided over by the Russian Foreign Minister with a briefing by United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.

    “We must work together to stop this downward spiral, using all United Nations tools,” Mr. Ban said, as he opened the meeting, which also included the participation of the United States Secretary of State and scores of other foreign ministers, with more than 75 high-ranking officials taking the floor in total.

    A concept note for the meeting, prepared by the Russian presidency of the Council (document S/2015/678), cited the deteriorating situations in Iraq, Syria, Libya and Yemen and the lack of progress in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It urged that a common understanding be worked out of “both the causes of the current profound security crisis in the region and of the political and other factors aggravating the crisis”, for the purpose of generating internationally agreed measures to stop escalation of conflict and terrorist activity.

    Mr. Ban, in his opening, noted that the United Nations was currently developing a plan of action to prevent violent extremism and stem related conflicts, while avoiding steps that bred the resentment on which extremism fed. The plan would set out support to Member States through a holistic approach encompassing peace and security, sustainable development, human rights and humanitarian action.

    “The people of the Middle East and North Africa deserve our full support in meeting these tests and steering the region towards a path of freedom, safety and dignity for all,” he said.

    Following those remarks, the Russian Foreign Minister made a statement in his national capacity, arguing that the rapidly deteriorating situation in the region and subsequent mass migration made it clear that new, united strategies were needed to defeat terrorism, taking into account the lessons learned after what he called previous “reckless actions” of international intervention.

    In Syria, he said, those who were fighting the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant/Sham (ISIL/ISIS), including the Government, should be supported in their effort, with due consideration for Syrian sovereignty and robust support to a political process of reconciliation and understanding. In that context, he reported that his country had been requested by the Syrian Government to provide military assistance to fight ISIL, which would be limited to air action and related engagement.

    Other speakers in the debate that ensued concurred that ISIL and other violent extremists posed grave dangers, not only to the region, but the entire globe. Noting the opportunities provided to terrorists by the ongoing conflict in Syria and the resulting mass flow of migrants, most called for effective action to support a Syrian-led political solution consistent with the Geneva Communiqué.

    Many expressed doubts, however, about working with the current Syrian Government towards that end, saying that its actions were causing massive civilian casualties. The French representative, calling for swift, and if possible united, action against ISIL in Syria and Iraq, stressed that all attacks against civilians and the moderate opposition must end during the quest for peace; abetting those who used barrel bombs would only fuel support for ISIL.

    The Secretaries of State of the United States and the United Kingdom, stating that the Syrian crisis had begun with the repression of peaceful protesters and subsequent abuse of civilians, asserted that ISIL could not be defeated if President Bashar al-Assad remained in power. Both pledged to speak with the Russian Federation to prevent confusion in air operations, but cautioned against any the targeting of moderate groups.

    Venezuela’s Foreign Minister, however, virulently criticized the foreign interventions that had led to regime change in the region, pointing to disastrous consequences in Iraq, Libya and elsewhere, and said that hegemonic power centres were again fomenting lies to destroy the Syrian State and allow terrorism to reign on its territory. Similarly, Syria’s representative said fighting terrorism required cooperation with his Government, stressing that military actions outside such cooperation violated the United Nations Charter and international legal norms.

    Many speakers today spoke on the need to combat the ideology of terrorism and the recruitment of foreign fighters. “The fight against terrorism cannot be won by force for punitive measures alone,” Malaysia’s Foreign Minister said, speaking of individuals from his country who had been attracted to fighting abroad, as well as the country’s efforts to counter radicalization and misuse of religious doctrine. Many spoke about eliminating what they saw were the root causes of radicalization, including widespread youth unemployment and marginalization of minorities.

    Some speakers spoke at length about the Israeli-Palestinian situation as a driver of terrorism, saying that the lack of progress in the peace process, the long-term occupation of Palestinian land and tensions over the holy sites were rallying issues for extremism. Israel’s representative, however, said his country had been beset by terrorism since its inception and called for renewed clarity and determination by democracies to prevail against the scourge.

    Also speaking today, including at the ministerial level, were representatives of China, Jordan, Chad, Spain, Lithuania, New Zealand, Angola, Chile, Nigeria, Iraq, Kuwait (on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference Ministerial Council), Syria, Germany, Egypt, Serbia, Iran, Turkey, Lebanon, Italy, Libya, Qatar, Croatia, Luxembourg, Cyprus, Slovakia, Belgium, Brazil, Kazakhstan, Greece, Slovenia, United Arab Emirates, Hungary, Switzerland, Bulgaria, Denmark, Algeria, Uruguay, Indonesia, Norway, Guatemala, Estonia, Finland, Poland, Sweden, Austria, Belarus, Liechtenstein, Netherlands, Australia, Iceland, Ukraine, Pakistan, Montenegro, Saudi Arabia, India, Morocco, Japan, South Africa and the Republic of Korea.

    Also speaking were senior officials from the European Union, League of Arab States, Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), Gulf Cooperation Council and the Holy See.

    The representatives of Iran and Syria took the floor for a second time.

    The meeting began at 10:07 a.m. and ended at 6:36 p.m.


    Council President SERGEY LAVROV, Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, speaking in his national capacity, said that the rapid deterioration of security in the Middle East and North Africa made it clear that new strategies were needed that considered all factors. Previous responses by the international community since the beginning of the so-called Arab Spring, including what he called “reckless actions”, had not stopped the unravelling. The lessons of such failures must be learned and applied. Describing the rapid spread of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant/Sham (ISIL/ISIS) and subsequent mass migration, he said that the main threat in Syria was terrorist aggression. Those who could and were standing up against it must be bolstered through the military expertise of the international community.

    He called for robust, united support for the political process in Syria and strengthening the State through national reconciliation and understanding. Given the gravity of the situation, united anti-terrorist activity on the basis of international law must start now. His country had been asked by the Syrian authorities to assist them in their fight against terrorism; such assistance would be limited to air actions and other kinds of support. Prioritizing the end to terrorist financing, he called for stringent implementation of the relevant Council resolutions through strengthened regional structures and national accountability. ISIL should be treated as a separate entity in all mechanisms of the Security Council, with a single database that tracked their cadres. All initiatives must be based on international law without violating the sovereignty of Governments, he said, adding that all such attempts in the past had been counterproductive. He looked forward to a frank discussion of the matter today.

    WANG YI, Minister for Foreign Affairs of China, expressed hope that the international community and the region’s peoples would jointly build a Middle East of peace, tolerance and self-advancement. As the region was an important platform for West-East exchange, he called for inclusiveness and broadmindedness. The Middle East’s future must be determined by regional countries. Those outside could provide help but should avoid interfering in internal affairs or imposing models. On the Syrian crisis, the international community should not intervene arbitrarily. Rather, it should step up humanitarian assistance. More efforts by European Union States to ease the refugee crisis were needed.

    He said political settlement was the only way forward. Parties must find a middle way that suited Syria’s national conditions and accommodated all parties’ interests. He called on the parties to consider a Geneva III conference on Syria and push for the start of a political transition that did not have predetermined results. On the Israel-Palestine conflict, he supported the early restoration of Palestinians’ rights and peaceful coexistence of two States. The international community should help re-start talks among all parties. He called for counter-terrorism cooperation under a United Nations framework that involved combating cybersecurity, blocking the flow of terrorist funding and strengthening intelligence exchange.

    NASSER JUDEH, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign Expatriates Affairs of Jordan, said the root causes of the Middle East situation included ongoing conflicts that had been magnified in the context of the Arab Spring. Some countries faced the cumulative effects of social and economic deprivation. He called on Israel to stop its violations and respect the sanctity of holy places in Occupied Jerusalem. Palestinians had been deprived their rights to establish a State on their territory, which had sparked the instability that, today, had morphed into various forms of terrorism. The only way forward was a two-State solution and the establishment of an independent Palestinian State along 1967 borders. Restoring stability required a comprehensive political process.

    On the situations in Syria and Iraq, he said sectarian marginalization had allowed ISIL to expand. On Yemen, there was no alternative to a political solution. Jordan rejected the idea of a Sunni-Shiite conflict, he said, stressing that the humanitarian dimension of open conflicts was increasing. Jordan hosted 1.4 million Syrian citizens, as well as large numbers of refugees from other countries. Council resolutions on combating terrorism, including resolution 2170 (2014), should be implemented. “We should seek to win over minds and hearts,” he said.

    LAURENT FABIUS, Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Development of France, said that in the face of barbarism by Da’esh, the Council had been “the Council of impotence”. France sought peace and security, a requirement that would determine its choices in Syria and Iraq. Noting that France was part of the coalition fighting ISIL in Iraq, he said that group was still a major threat. In Syria, ISIL had prospered with the complicity with the Syrian regime, whose “scorched earth” policy had alienated the majority of its population. While the international military response should be strengthened, the solution must be a political one.

    “We must hit ISIL wherever we can,” he said, adding, “We will do so.” Others were welcome to join on three conditions, the first being that there was clarity as to whom was being fought: ISIL, not civilians or moderate opposition forces, who were defending their vision of a unified democratic Syria that respected all communities. The second condition was an end to violence against civilians and the flood of refugees. It was said that 80 per cent of refugees had fled due to indiscriminate bombing by the regime. The Council must ban the use in Syria of barrel bombs and chlorine gas. The third condition was that the conflict be addressed at its roots, requiring a political transition. Broad negotiations, under the aegis of the Special Envoy and control of a contact group that comprised the permanent Council members and key regional partners, were needed. France was ready to act with its traditional partners, as well as the Russian Federation and others, on the basis of those conditions.

    MOUSSA FAKI MAHAMAT, Minister for Foreign Affairs and African Integration of Chad, concurred that full consideration of the causes of violent extremism was critically needed. Enumerating plausible root causes, he said that the situation was often aggravated by foreign intervention. In Libya, the African Union had pleaded for a peaceful resolution of the situation, but military action that toppled the regime made the situation much worse. Such mistakes were exacerbated by many other weaknesses in the international community in conflict prevention and control of arms flows. A two-State solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict must be reached, along with an end to counterproductive Israeli practices. In Syria, renewed momentum to promote direct dialogue between the parties was critical. He urged the international community to come together with regional organizations under the leading role of the Security Council to end the “existential threat” of terrorism.

    JOSÉ MANUEL GARCÍA MARGALLO, Minister for Foreign Affairs and Cooperation of Spain, recounting his country’s long experience with terrorism, said a firm stance was needed: “We don’t negotiate with terrorists, we destroy them.” It was necessary to expose the real face of those criminals and hold them accountable for their crimes. The massive flow of refugees from the Middle East and North Africa meant action was needed now. Spain was assisting the Iraqi Government to train forces that could combat ISIL, had convened forums to end the recruitment of foreign fighters and was working with Governments in the Sahel, among other activities. As terrorism must be fought within the rule of law, he noted an initiative to create an international criminal court that concentrated on terrorist crimes. He also spoke of efforts under the Madrid Club and the Alliance of Civilizations to combat terrorism. He called for addressing root causes, attention to social media and unity in the fight against that scourge.

    LINAS LINKEVIČIUS, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Lithuania, said Syrians comprised 70 per cent of those trying to cross the Mediterranean. While it was a glaring failure of the Syrian Government to protect its population, the Council should have acted early and forcefully on the crisis in Syria. Instead, it was paralysed by a succession of vetoes aimed at protecting the perpetrators, and, in that connection, he welcomed France’s initiative on veto restraint. The European Union had proposed tackling the causes that made people become refugees. In that context, he recalled the Russian Federation’s aggression against Ukraine and illegal annexation of Crimea, which had caused massive displacement. The Council had an impressive normative base for combating terrorism and there should be no gaps in its implementation. Tackling terrorism involved addressing its underlying causes, as well as the injustices that made people vulnerable to incitement. He also urged a focus on accountability.

    DELCY RODRÍGUEZ, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Venezuela, said there was a moral debt to be paid to Palestinians. The conflict had been provoked by Israel’s occupation of Palestinian Territory, which complicated the broader situation in the Middle East. A two-State solution could not be achieved when terrorists were massacring Palestinians; there must be two equal, sovereign States. Israel promoted terrorism, which affected Israelis themselves. She urged examining power centres that controlled the media and other actors, as well as the economic models that had led to poverty, asking whether the Arab Spring had brought greater happiness and democracy. The outcomes in Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan had in essence been their destruction. Venezuela’s President had called for a new geopolitical system that would guarantee peace. She urged respect for the principles of self-determination, sovereignty and territorial integrity, as well as combating terrorism at its root causes. International law must be applied over the will of violent groups, illegal occupation of States and those perpetuating violence.

    MURRAY MCCULLY, Minister for Foreign Affairs of New Zealand, said the failure today to even agree on a presidential statement was symbolic of the dysfunction and mistrust characterizing the Council’s performance on Syria and too many of the conflicts raging in the region. The 250,000 dead and 12 million displaced in Syria should tell the Council that it must end that dysfunction. The path forward was evident. The situation and the actors must be taken as they were and a transition process must be collectively imposed. At the same time, the principles of justice and international law must be upheld and impunity ruled out for those responsible for mass atrocities. The Council and key actors must unite behind a process that married the pragmatism needed to stop the conflict with the principled solutions that would enable Syria and other countries in the region to start rebuilding.

    GEORGES REBELO PINTO CHIKOTI, Minister for External Relations of Angola, said that the answer to extremism was complex and varied from country to country, but marginalization of populations and foreign interference were common factors. Extremism could only be combated by discrediting its ideological basis and fostering inclusion and respect for human rights. In the Middle East and North Africa, the raging conflicts must be ended. Revolutionary change during the Arab Spring had led to disintegration of national structures and, therefore, gradual change with due respect for Government institutions was seen as preferable. Terrorists thrived in situations of chaos. Educational reform was also needed to engender a new generation of independence-minded citizens; an international mechanism was also needed to foster such reform while respecting sovereignty and territorial integrity. The Security Council, in that effort, should reaffirm principles of peaceful settlement of disputes.

    DATO’ SRI ANIFAH AMAN, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Malaysia, said revisiting the underlying causes connected to conflicts in the region was timely as the affected countries and societies were perhaps worse today than when those conflicts began. Malaysia reiterated its fullest condemnation of all acts, methods and practices of terrorism and strongly rejected the association of terrorism with any race, culture or religion. Political and security vacuums in countries were exploited by terrorist groups to increase recruitment, expand territorial control and smuggle weapons. The presence of terrorist groups had depended on sectarian divisions, thereby exacerbating political and social instability. Violations of human rights and the dire humanitarian predicament in the affected countries provided a compelling narrative of recruitment.

    He said that the war must be won, not through force of arms, but through a triumph of mind, heart and will. In that context, Malaysia’s legislation to prevent terrorism focused on rehabilitation and de-radicalization. The international community could effectively address the threat posed by terrorism only if it was prepared to take a self-critical and unbiased look at the root causes. The world must not allow the plight of the long-suffering Palestinians living under occupation to be cynically exploited by terrorist groups. In order to continue playing a constructive and positive role in the region’s conflicts, the Council must find the will to overcome differences and speak in one voice.

    JOHN KERRY, Secretary of State of the United States, recounting action in the Security Council on terrorism over the years, said that there was no disagreement on goals; the question was means. Ending terrorist financing, combating terrorists’ ideology and use of social media, settlement of conflicts and stopping flows of foreign fighters were part of agreed tactics. Urgent actions must be taken on immediate threats, and longer-term efforts must be taken to end radicalization. Unless young people found opportunities, they were vulnerable to recruitment. Corruption must be ended. He pledged United States’ cooperation with other countries and civil societies in such efforts. Meanwhile, humanitarian and military action must be stepped up. In Syria, he supported all genuine efforts to defeat ISIL, including Russian initiatives. His country was prepared to hold talks so that Russian efforts did not conflict with the global anti-ISIL coalition, which had been operating for over a year with more than 3,000 sorties against ISIL targets.

    “But we must not be confused in our efforts to defeat ISIL with support for Assad,” he said, maintaining that ISIL could not be defeated as long as Mr. Assad remained in power. He maintained that the fight began when peaceful protesters, looking for a better future, were beaten by Mr. Assad’s “thugs”. Mr. Assad would never be accepted by those whom he had harmed, he added, calling on the Syrian President to help end the war and decline to be part of a future Syrian Government. He stressed that Mr. Assad was not a key to stopping ISIL, maintaining that he had been concentrating his firepower on moderates while allowing the extremists to take over broad swathes of land. He called for intensified international efforts to bring about a broadly supported political initiative that led to a transition in Syria, consistent with the Geneva Communiqué.

    PHILIP HAMMOND, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs of the United Kingdom, said that as part of the anti-ISIL coalition, his country had conducted air strikes in Iraq. He acknowledged Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan for hosting Syrian refugees, saying the United Kingdom had had provided £1.1 billion in aid to alleviate crisis and neighbouring countries. The Assad regime had led Syria into the crisis, with its brutal repression of peaceful protestors and attacks against civilians. “We reject those who say the poison of Assad is the cure for the cancer of ISIL,” he said. Syrian forces killed more civilians each month than any other actor, as it was focused on destroying moderate opposition groups and civilian centres. Any alignment with the Syrian President would only strengthen ISIL.

    Syria, he said, could be an effective partner only with a representative Government that worked with the international community to counter ISIL. The Syrian President should step aside so a political transition could allow Syrians to unite against Islamist extremism. Others should support the Special Envoy in negotiating such a transition. The Russian Federation had assumed a heavy responsibility by publicly propping up the Syrian President. The world would expect it to use its influence to stop the use of barrel bombs and prevent any use of chemicals as weapons by the regime. Support of the regime was incompatible with war against ISIL. He urged the Russian Federation to confirm that this morning’s military action only targeted ISIL and Al-Qaida affiliates, and not moderate opponents of the Assad regime.

    HERALDO MUÑOZ, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Chile, said the situation in the region was a source of legitimate concern to the international community. The action of armed and terrorist groups was aggravating instability and multiple tensions in communities, which needed strengthened coexistence. Cohesion, inclusiveness and acceptance of differences were the common property of mankind and it was essential to apply them in efforts to bring confidence, peace and stability to the region. Recent experience had shown that the use of force could reduce the military capacity of terrorist groups but could not prevent the dissemination of ideas to attract new supporters and inspire violent ambitions in persons vulnerable to extremist messages.

    It was thus essential, he said, to replace the ideology of terror by a partnership of shared values, with preventive and multidimensional approaches at the local, national and global levels. That central idea had been accepted by the Council’s ministerial meeting in Madrid in July in the context of the Counter-Terrorism Committee. As President of the Council in January, Chile had stressed the link between inclusive development and international peace and security because the underlying causes of the crises were connected with various forms of socio-economic, gender, ethnic, tribal, religious or ideological exclusion. The Council must be part of a collective effort to urgently address those failures.

    U. JOY OGWU (Nigeria), calling for the resumption of negotiations for a two-State solution in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, said that the lack of progress there had exacerbated the rise of terrorism in the Middle East and Africa. She called for decisive action to neutralize those terrorist groups and to end the threat of foreign terrorist fighters. Intelligence sharing and capacity-building for Member States were an important part of that effort. No new resolutions were needed, but serious implementation was critical, and she called for that to begin now.

    IBRAHIM AL-ESHAIKER AL-JAAFARI, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Iraq, stressed the importance of resolve and unity among the international community in the fight against terrorism, and the implementation of all relevant Security Council resolutions, particularly concerning terrorist financing. He stressed that despite many challenges, his Government was working hard to relieve the conditions of the displaced and other victims of terrorism in his country, while it endeavoured to conduct military operations to stop ISIL, with the support of an international coalition. He expressed thanks to that coalition. He also underlined the importance of national unity in the context of that struggle. He called for greater action to stop terrorists from coming to his region; they were now arriving from more than 100 countries. A comprehensive approach that incorporated efforts by regional organizations was needed.

    SHEIKH SABAH KHALED AL-HAMAD AL SABAH, First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign Affairs of Kuwait, speaking on behalf of the Ministerial Council of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), said settlement of conflicts and addressing the terrorism threat in the Middle East and North Africa topped the list of priorities. The region faced enormous and unprecedented security risks and conflicts that had dangerous consequences, amid a remarkable decrease in levels of economic and social growth. The majority of the 60 million people requiring humanitarian assistance around the world were from the region. The tragic circumstances there had provided fertile ground for terrorists and extremist groups to commit the most horrible crimes. Although some claim to have been inspired by religion, there was no place for such heinous acts in the Islamic faith. Terrorism had no religion and was not tied to any country, race or culture. Therefore, it could not be combated through confrontation or conflict with a great religion like Islam.

    In order to combat terrorism, he said, the OIC had built partnerships with international and regional organizations, Sheikh Sabah said. The failure of the international community, represented by the Security Council, to resolve conflicts and grave crises in the region had contributed to the exacerbation of the suffering. As time passed, those crises became intertwined, difficult and complicated. The most outstanding example of failure was the Palestinian question, the core of the Arab-Israeli conflict. The Council must assume its responsibilities, as stipulated by the Charter, and work on implementing its resolutions in support of the rights of the Palestinian people.

    WALID AL-MOUALLEM, Vice Prime Minister, Minister for Foreign Affairs and Expatriates of Syria, questioned what the Council had achieved in combating terrorism in Iraq and Syria, in implementing its resolutions, especially 2170 (2014), 2178 (2014) and 2199 (2015), and in dealing with countries that funded, armed, trained and provided a haven for ISIS, Al-Nusra Front and others. The United States led a coalition in the framework of a strategy to eliminate “Da’esh/ISIS” in Iraq and contain it in Syria. Those groups had increased in power, arms, funds and ferocity, due to the protection, assistance and funding from Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan and Western countries “known to you”.

    He said combating terrorism in Syria required cooperation with his Government, whose army was fighting the battle against terrorism alone. Military actions by the United Kingdom and France on Syrian territory violated the United Nations Charter, international legal norms and Syrian sovereignty. He supported the Russian President’s call for the creation of a regional and international coalition, of which Syria was an essential party. He urged regional countries to implement Council resolutions on combating terrorism. He urged the Council to stop the flow of terrorists into Syria.

    FRANK-WALTER STEINMEIER, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Germany, said there was much the international community had failed to do in terms of terrorism in the Middle East and North Africa. However, as the nuclear deal with Iran demonstrated, even the most intractable crises could be resolved through the requisite political will. Today’s debate highlighted differences, as well as convergences. In Syria, there was a need to build a political process, and the Council needed to ensure that its resolutions were implemented. Building on extensive consultations, the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General had laid out a road map, which Germany wholeheartedly supported. The international community needed to do the same.

    SAMEH HASSAN SHOKRY SELIM, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Egypt, said that unity of will from the international community was required to resolve the crises gripping the region. Egypt was interested in resolving regional conflicts in order to prevent the further erosion of State sovereignty. He supported the Russian Federation’s position that there was a need to broadly evaluate the region’s conflicts in order to foster enduring solutions. During 2011, some countries believed that the prevailing trend was a legitimate aspiration of the people and provided a moderate alternative to extremism. However, events had taken a different turn. Egyptian society, for example, refused to politicize religion. Diversity in the Arab world must be respected in order to build cohesion and stability. An independent Palestinian State, good governance, and provision of basic services could collectively provide the region the peace and security to which it aspired.

    FEDERICA MOGHERINI, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, said that two top priorities for the international community were finding a political solution to conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa, and to combat terrorist groups. For too long, those two priorities had been seen as conflicting goals, which was a division that weakened actions on both tracks. Those two goals could only go hand-in-hand. It was necessary to respond to the symptoms of those crises, especially the influx of refugees from the region. The international community needed to address the military threats posed by Da’esh and Al-Qaida. The European Union was assisting partners to support security agencies in Iraq, and had launched the first concrete action together with United Nations mine action programme to remove mines in Iraqi regions freed from Da’esh. It was only with a cooperative environment that peace could be built in Syria and Da’esh defeated. Da’esh needed local allies, and where it found none, it was easier to eradicate. It was politics that would lead to its defeat. Inclusiveness and democracy brought stability, which was the most powerful weapon against terrorism.

    IVICA DAČIĆ, First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign Affairs of Serbia, said the political, social, economic, inter-ethnic and ideological tensions in the region presented a challenge for the entire international community. The migrant wave from conflict-ridden areas had not bypassed Serbia, which the country could not be expected to bear alone. Coordinated international action, and not partial and limited local steps, was the solution. The international community needed to define the next steps to stabilize the conditions in the region according to the United Nations Charter and the principles of international law. Stepped-up activities to promote the culture of peace, mutual understanding and confidence in the region must be accompanied by efforts to encourage concessions and compromise, an example Serbia had demonstrated very clearly.

    M. JAVAD ZARIF, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Iran, said violent extremism, in today’s globalized world, continued to affect regions near and far. No member of the international community could feel safe from the fallout from the crisis in the Middle East and North Africa. Thwarting the threat required a serious, well-thought-out and coordinated effort. It also required a new mindset away from the old paradigm of exclusion governed by a zero-sum mentality, which had only produced negative sum outcomes.

    Iran’s President, in his recent address to the General Assembly, had proposed a comprehensive plan of action in order to translate the broad international consensus on the need to uproot violent extremism into targeted and effective action, he said. The plan of action should aim to support a cultural and ideological front against extreme ideologies, address such contributing factors as dictatorship, poverty, corruption and discrimination, counter Islamophobia and engage all regional States and international actors. It should also address the occupation of Palestine and Israeli atrocities against the Palestinian people over so many decades. He regretted that one or two neighbours of Iran had failed to recognize the scale of the threat and continued to behave irresponsibility.

    FERIDUN HADI SINIRLIOĞLU, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Turkey, said that the brutal oppression of legitimate demands for democracy and other pressures combined to create a breeding ground for violent extremism and terrorism. Those were not Middle Eastern and North African phenomena and should not be associated with any religion or geography. Terrorism was a global and transnational scourge that needed to be address through multilateral and bilateral action. Da’esh was an overriding security threat in Turkey, which did not spread organically like a cancer, but rather was aided by Assad’s totalitarian regime that employed any means available, including chemical weapons, to terrorize its own people into submission. The international community and the United Nations Security Council needed to address the root causes of the problems in Syria through resolute action, and it must do all it could to downgrade and defeat terrorist organizations like Da’esh. There was no room for moral relativism. Created safe and protected areas could keep Syrians in Syria and pave the way for refugees’ return.

    GEBRAN BASSIL, Minister for Foreign Affairs and Emigrants of Lebanon, said the fight against terrorism was an international one since the scourge was a menace to international peace and security. The fight against terrorism in the Middle East and North Africa region could not be won without the cooperation of the countries of that region. Lebanon was fully engaged in that fight against radicalism, and had mobilized troops and boots on the ground, as it was at the forefront of the battle. Lebanon’s troops were engaged in daily fights, and intelligence services were tracking dormant and active terrorist cells inside the country. It was fighting to protect the rights of minorities in the Middle East, which were at the foundation of the region’s identity. Lebanon was also striving to safeguard collective values; its fall would mean the fall of the last bastion of diversity in the Middle East and would lead to the uncontrolled spread of terror into neighbouring Europe and the rest of the world.

    PAOLO GENTILONI, Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Italy, said the advent of Da’esh had brought the terrorist threat to new and unprecedented levels. While important results had been achieved by the international coalition against that group, more effort was needed at the military and political levels. In Syria, despite sporadic and limited ceasefires, the conflict was bound to continue until the international community fostered a lasting and inclusive political solution. A Syria without a clear leadership and a way forward would be in no one’s interest. While upholding Iraq’s efforts to increase and promote inclusivity, the international community needed to prevent any further expansion of Da’esh, most notably in Libya. The eradication of extremism and terrorism required a global, multi-layered response combining both preventive and repressive measures. Calling for an unbending commitment to countering Da’esh’s narrative, he said the preservation of the ethnic and religious fabric of the region was vital to strengthen the strategy to counter extremism.

    MOHAMED EL HADI DAYRI, Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Libya, said there needed to be a comprehensive strategy to defeat Da’esh and other heinous terrorist groups. ISIS was expanding and there was no effective movement to support the army and peoples of Libya to staunch the terrorism. Scores of innocent civilians were being killed in Derna, Benghazi and Tripoli. The Libyan army’s capacity needed to be bolstered, as it lacked the resources to ward off the increasing threats to the country and people. The fear was that ISIS would expand further. In view of the international community’s failure to act, the concerns of the brothers and sisters in Africa and in Europe were legitimate. He shared the concerns over the proliferation of terrorism and its repercussions, like the Europeans who intended to combat the human traffickers sending thousands of Africans and Arabs to their deaths in the Mediterranean.

    NABIL ELARABY, Secretary-General of the League of Arab States, said that the international community, in discussing terrorism, must not forget that there was also the terrorism of States, namely, the practices of Israel. Palestine had been occupied since 1948. The Security Council had called on Israel to withdraw from Egypt, Jordan and Syria; however, Israel had not withdrawn from Palestine, as well as some parts of Lebanese and Syrian territory, and had also tried to grab other Palestinian territories through actions considered illegal by the Security Council and the International Court of Justice. He asked why the Council did not take action even while Israel attacked Christian and Muslim holy sites, including the Al-Aqsa Mosque. One of the reasons for the current state of affairs was the use of the veto. The Council had started working in 1946 and yet its rules of procedure were still provisional. There was not a permanent standing set of standards, he said, urging the international community to face up to the challenges of the twenty-first century.

    KHALID BIN MOHAMMED AL-ATTIYA, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Qatar, said the latest bombing campaigns in Syria were distressing, and he urged everyone to side with the people of that country. While the peace and security operations of the United Nations had been successful in many areas, they had been non-existent or ineffective in others. In the Middle East and North Africa in particular, the Council had often demonstrated weakness. That, in turn, underlined the need to reform the Council. The international community should revive the political process on the Palestinian-Israeli front if it wanted to reduce tensions in the region. Political settlements in Syria and Yemen, too, would require a demonstration of greater political will on the part of the international community.

    VESNA PUSIĆ, First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign and European Affairs of Croatia, said that the challenges gripping the Middle East and North Africa required an exceptional, coordinated and comprehensive response, as well as strong leadership and partnership. Such action should have a strong regional and country-specific dimension and outreach that would bring on board all international and regional players. The current migration crisis seriously tested Europe, and her country had demonstrated its ability to face it. The unprecedented crisis had shown how the world was intertwined; demonstrating once again that the answer had to be of the same character.

    JEAN ASSELBORN, Minister for Foreign and European Affairs of Luxembourg, said the terrorist groups in the region threatened the entire world through their destructive madness. In order to effectively fight that threat, it was necessary to understand the root causes. If Da’esh was to disappear today, more monstrous groups would likely emerge because the rise of terrorist groups could not be separated from the politics in the region. In Syria, the world must fight terrorism without playing into the hands of the Assad regime. Efforts at reconciliation and mediation must be supported more vigorously in Iraq, Yemen and Libya. Investment in the well-being of youth must be prioritized in order to dispel the feelings of exclusion that fuelled terrorism. The security of Israel would be strengthened by the establishment of an independent Palestinian State. The past could not be changed, but lessons could be learned for the future.

    IOANNIS KASOULIDES, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Cyprus, said the United Nations was and should remain at the apex of international order and legality. No crisis could be resolved by a single Power or stakeholder. While formulating policies to counter the terrorist threats, efforts must be made towards addressing socio-economic and political exclusion, youth unemployment and limited access to education. The formation of a national unity government in Libya was overdue and it was important to foster a political transition process in Syria. Da’esh posed a threat that affected all, which required more to be done on the issue of tracking and interrupting financial flows.

    MIROSLAV LAJČÁK, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign and European Affairs of Slovakia, described the rise of terror as perhaps the most serious, shocking, painful and shameful reality of the beginning of the twenty-first century. Da’esh was a fake, disillusioned and dangerous alternative of governance, rooted in fear and violence. Military suppression was only a fragment of the solution, the main part of which must be a commitment to better governance. The international community could not focus on preventive measures in an environment of terror and fear. Nor could it afford any new centres of instability in Middle East and North Africa. All actors needed to use their influence to avoid escalations. Any foreign involvement in favour of individual parties could break the fragile trust in the political track. All relevant Council resolutions must be fully implemented in a timely manner, regardless of whether they were adopted under Chapter VII of the Charter.

    IYAD AMEEN MADANI, Secretary-General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), associating with the statement by Kuwait delivered on behalf of the group’s ministerial council, stressed the need to honestly and properly diagnose the historical backgrounds and root causes of conflicts in the region. The remnants of colonialism, ill-conceived cold war strategies, the consequences of the ongoing suffering of the Palestinian people owing to an unjust and illegal occupation, and the invasion of Iraq had dangerous fallouts. The multifaceted dimensions of the conflicts must be addressed.

    Within that context, he said, the OIC had initiated specific projects that focused on understanding and addressing the political and socioeconomic environments that bred conditions conducive to the spread of terrorism and violent extremism. It also focused on the need to counter all types of radical extremist discourses as well as the underlying causes of sectarian violence. Today, the flag of Palestine flew high at the United Nations, reflecting the sentiment of the overwhelming majority of the international community in support of that just cause.

    DIDIER REYNDERS, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign and European Affairs of Belgium, said the international community was united in its resolve to defeat terrorism and must take concrete action in that regard. The legitimate concerns of the populations must be taken into account and human rights upheld. Countries showing exemplary generosity by hosting refugees must be supported. Calling for a political settlement in Syria, he stressed the need for a reconciliation process in Iraq, Libya and Yemen. The renewed tensions in Jerusalem underscored the need for revitalizing the political process between Palestine and Israel to ensure durable peace and stability in the region.

    MAURO VIEIRA, Minister for External Relations of Brazil, reiterated his country’s repudiation of all forms of terrorism and extremism, appalled by the destruction of cultural and historic heritage in Syria, Iraq and Mali. As long as the international community disregarded poverty and the fragility of national institutions as drivers of armed conflict, no solution would be found. Military interventions only led to weak institutions, sectarianism, power vacuums and arms proliferation. It was high time for the Council to focus on political dialogue and preventive action. “What we really need is better diplomacy,” he said. Brazil had issued more than 7,700 entry visas for Syrian residents affected by the crisis. Israel and Palestine must resume talks under parameters that could lead to a two-State solution. In Libya and Yemen, he urged avoiding the use of unilateral force and supported working with parties to promote dialogue.

    ERLAN A. IDRISSOV, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Kazakhstan said that as the world continued to witness unprecedented crises of grave magnitude unfolding in the Middle East and North Africa, now was the time for joint action. For decades, the situation in the region had been a major factor in the destabilization of global security. Improvement in the current situation in the Middle East depended on resolution of the Palestinian issue. Kazakhstan recognized the legitimate right of self-determination for the Palestinian people and strongly supported the creation of an independent State of Palestine within 1967 borders. States must reject the unconstitutional and illegal use of military force, including external foreign military interventions, which only led to the destruction of Statehood. The humanitarian disaster in Syria was no longer considered a regional issue, as the crisis had spread far beyond the Middle East. Kazakhstan had hosted a meeting of Syrian opposition leaders in May to discuss possible solutions. While recognizing terrorism as a global threat, he called for the establishment of a United Nations-led counter-terrorism coalition to develop a common mechanism to defeat that evil and bring perpetrators and their supporters to justice.

    NIKOS KOTZIAS, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Greece, said that hundreds of thousands of people had been driven from the Middle East and North Africa region, creating new pressures on societies and economies of neighbouring countries, as well as some far beyond the region itself. Greece was situated at the crossroads of the refugee crisis and was also particularly concerned about the fate of the minority communities in Iraq and the region, including Christian communities, which, after two millenniums, were facing an existential threat due to the atrocities of ISIS. That threat continued to undermine the stability and political dynamics of Iraq and Syria, leaving the security situation in the region very volatile, and waves of instability were also being felt farther afield. It was crucial for the international community to work collectively to reach a long-due solution to the Syrian crisis through the immediate initiation of an inclusive political process. The war needed to stop, and there needed to be an alliance for peace and the reconstruction of Syria.

    KARL ERJAVEC, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign Affairs of Slovenia, said terrorism and extremism in the region could not be tolerated regardless of their causes. Women and children were particularly vulnerable to what often amounted to crimes against humanity. Military means must be supported by political efforts to resolve conflicts through transparency and dialogue. Prevention efforts presupposed the positive contribution of youth, who required investment in their education. The international community must find ways to ensure accountability for those committing atrocities. He supported referral of the situation in Syria to the International Criminal Court through the Security Council. Resumption of political talks between Israel and the Palestinians was crucial to lasting peace and security in the region.

    ABDULLAH GHOBASH, Minister of State for Foreign Affairs of the United Arab Emirates, said the security challenges in the Middle East and North Africa had grown both in scope and barbarity. Terrorist groups had taken advantage of the political vacuum in countries like Libya, Syria and Yemen. His country believed that peace and security in the region could be bolstered by achieving a final, lasting and just settlement of the Palestinian cause, the major threat to peace and security in the region. The political talks envisaged for Syria held promise and should be taken to their logical conclusion. The Charter’s principle of respect for sovereignty and non-intervention must be upheld to foster a just world order, while global efforts must be pursued to resolve global challenges.

    PÉTER SZIJJÁRTÓ, Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade of Hungary, said countering terrorism in the Middle East was possible through concerted international action. ISIS had built a network in Europe and had caused greater damage to the world’s cultural heritage than at any time since the Second World War. Added to that were bad international decisions, which had placed the European Union under its biggest ever challenge. The situation in the Middle East and North Africa should be stabilized through more effective action against ISIS, including by precluding it from gaining ground and subjecting it to International Criminal Court investigations. Another task was to stop the war in Syria through political dialogue, which required pragmatic cooperation between the Russian Federation and the trans-Atlantic community.

    DIDIER BURKHALTER, Chief of the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs of Switzerland, said that both logistical and financial resources were needed, depending on particular situations. All regional and international actors shared in the responsibility to stabilize Syria, and must come to the table for discussion. He welcomed diplomatic efforts to find an understanding and to eliminate maximalist positions and find compromise. The only path to peace was inclusive dialogue. That process would be difficult given the enormous sacrifices that must be made. Parties to the conflict must make difficult choices to find compromise, as it would not be possible to reach a lasting political solution unless all worked towards peace, and the millions of women, children and men deserved those efforts and sincerity. That was not only for Syria but to stabilize Iraq and resolve the conflicts in Libya and Yemen. Switzerland could offer expertise and facilitate discussion in Geneva, if necessary, and support United Nations’ efforts. He expressed concern over the various military actions in Syria, and called on the council to restore peace and security.

    DANIEL MITOV, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Bulgaria, said that without peace in the Middle East, violent extremists would take advantage of the situation. As a partner in the coalition against ISIL, Bulgaria was working to degrade and ultimately defeat the threat that Da’esh posed to the world. The United Nations could undertake further actions in stepping up international cooperation to counter terrorism, and Bulgaria looked forward to the Secretary-General’s action plan in that regard. At the crossroads between Europe and the Middle East, Bulgaria bore the consequences of the unprecedented migration pressure generated by the conflicts in the region and expansion of Da’esh.

    KRISTIAN JENSEN, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Denmark said the discussion was a reminder that the threat of violence and extremism was real. It was not only a threat to the Middle Eastern and North African countries, but was rather a global challenge. Sovereignty and respect for human rights went hand in hand. This morning, it was good to hear the Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation say that his country would participate in defeating ISIL. However, it was troubling to see who the Russia Federation had been militarily active against. Rumours said that it had not been ISIL that had been hit. The international community must focus on how to prevent the creation of terrorists in the first place, such as through jobs and democracy for all. It must focus on applying early preventive efforts, while managing more imminent ones. In Georgia and Tunisia, Denmark was launching an initiative to counter radicalism by focusing on youth, dialogue and preventive measures. To reduce the appeal of ISIL to foreign fighters, Denmark was also working to document its violent crimes.

    ABDELKADER MESSAHEL, Minister for Maghreb Affairs, the African Union and the League of Arab States of Algeria, said the political conflicts and crises in the Middle East and North Africa had resulted in the proliferation of violent and extremist groups. The erosion of the State-facilitated illicit activities, which financed terrorism and extremism. The long-running failure by the international community to facilitate enduring conflicts allowed terrorist groups to craft a narrative for recruitment. The urgency of a political settlement in Syria had become clearer, while the Libyan parties needed to establish a government of national unity as soon as possible.

    RODOLFO NIN NOVOA, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Uruguay, said the growth of terrorism in the Middle East and North Africa had acquired a transnational character, which called for concerted global action. Such action needed to be in consonance with the Charter and provide solutions based on a holistic approach. Dealing with challenges such as exclusion, lack of education and basic services would go a long way towards reducing and eventually eliminating the threat. In light of ISIL’s barbarity, it was not possible to employ traditional means of peaceful resolution of disputes, but to pursue options compatible with international law.

    RETNO L.P. MARSUDI, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Indonesia, said a political solution through diplomacy was the only way to resolve the conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa. It was important that such inclusive political and reconciliation processes have no pre-set or preconceived outcomes. A myriad of issues had arisen as a result of continued conflicts in the region, such as the influx of irregular migrations, the rise of ISIS and the emergence of foreign terrorist fighters, which underlined the need to address the root causes. Multi-stakeholder engagement to counter the terrorist ideology should empower the role of women and mothers, moderate forces and civil society. The role of the United Nations should be strengthened by enhancing coordination among counter-terrorism bodies, as well as by synergies with initiatives outside the United Nations framework.

    BØRGE BRENDE, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Norway, said that war and civil strife in the Middle East and North Africa were giving extremist groups the room to grow into a threat out of all proportion to their strength. For that reason, his country was contributing to all five lines of effort set out by the coalition against ISIL. At the same time, it recognized that all actors must avoid creating further complications on the ground, and that unemployment and humanitarian relief must be addressed. In Syria, a political solution was urgently needed and would only come about if world leaders remained completely focused on supporting it.

    CARLOS RAÚL MORALES, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Guatemala, said the consequences of the violence in the region had been disastrous for the civilian population, which required a redoubling of efforts to find viable solutions. Having served on the Council, Guatemala had the opportunity to see first-hand how that body failed to tackle the roots of conflict, often due to political sensitivities of its members. However, it had also seen situations where enough political will could be mustered to make necessary structural changes to counteract the scourges underpinning conflicts.

    In the context of the Middle East and North Africa, he said the time had come to find that political will and thoroughly address the thorny issues that helped foster the terrorist threat, such as socio-economic exclusion, easy availability of weapons and violations of fundamental human rights. Although the Council could strongly influence the course of events on the ground, ultimately, peace could only be preserved by the parties to a conflict. It was not possible to combat terrorism solely with the use of military force. The legitimacy and action of the United Nations was vital, as was ensuring accountability.

    MARINA KALJURAND, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Estonia, expressing grave concern about the recent wave of terrorism and violent extremism, said the inclusion of the terms and requirements of resolution 2178 (2014) in her country’s national legislation was almost complete. Yesterday’s summit of the international coalition to counter ISIL reflected the commitment to address the terrorist threat. “We have to stop this aggressive and brutal movement,” she said, urging the effective use of resources and capabilities, and avoiding parallel tracks. Eliminating terrorism required addressing tensions between non-extremist political, ethnic and religious groups. The United Nations should maintain its approach to addressing terrorism, regardless of religious, political, historical or ethnic motivations.

    TIMO SOINI, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Finland, said that the current situation was unbearable in many parts of the Middle East and North Africa. Millions of young people were unemployed and lacked future perspectives, which could lead to their exclusion from the economic, social and political life. Unfortunately, terrorist organizations used discontent and marginalization for their benefit. Democracy, human rights and inclusive economic development were fundamental elements in creating stable societies. It was essential to use society’s full potential, especially when addressing difficult social problems, and he highlighted the importance of women’s full participation in decision-making. Religious and traditional leaders were often influential representatives of local communities in questions related to peace and mediation, and for that reason Finland had sponsored the establishment of the Network of Religious and Traditional Peacemakers. Decisive action should be taken against terrorist groups such as ISIL. At the same time, the international community needed to ensure that all measures to counter terrorism complied with international law, human rights law, and refugee and international humanitarian law.

    HENRYKA MOSCICKA-DENDYS, Undersecretary of State at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Poland, said history taught that people would not consent to live under an authoritarian regime indefinitely, nor would they tolerate lawlessness, accept brutality, or give up ambitions for a better life. Arab revolutions had not created a terrorist threat; however, they had created a political vacuum that offered permissive conditions for violent extremism and terrorism to gain ground. Simply repeating the mantra to “find a political solution” would not help. Nor would a security response by itself be sufficient to address the challenges posed by foreign fighters. In elaborating peace solutions in the Middle East and North Africa, the international community should not forget about diversity, citizenship and equality. There should be more emphasis on the prevention of terrorism by examining and addressing the conditions conducive to its spread. Poland supported international efforts to fight terrorism and radicalization and valued close cooperation with the United Nations, the European Union and its strategic partners.

    MARGOT WALLSTRÖM, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Sweden, associating with the European Union, called for an intensification of efforts to find political settlements to end the civil war in Syria. The Council, she said, should endorse the establishment of an international contact group in support of Staffan de Mistura’s four working groups, with the participation of all key players. She urged the Syrian Government to contribute to defeating ISIL and terrorism, by ending the attacks against civilians and committing to a genuine political transition. On Iraq, she said her country would continue to participate in stabilization activities. In the entire region, it was critical to counter the widespread and systematic violence against women and children, she stressed.

    SEBASTIAN KURZ, Federal Minister for Europe, Integration and Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Austria, noting the immense scope of migration to Europe due to ISIL’s “barbaric acts”, said his country would continue to support the coalition against the group and provide humanitarian aid to those in need. However, more must be done to stop ISIL. The Security Council must unite around a mandate to fight ISIL and protect civilians. He pledged his country’s support to all such efforts. The agreement with Iran on its nuclear programme provided hope that negotiations could succeed. A settlement was urgently needed for the sake of the people of the region and the whole world.

    VALENTIN RYBAKOV, Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs of Belarus, pointed to the failure of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference as evidence of backward movement in ensuring security in the Middle East. Some problems had been brought to the fore, while others had been “hushed up”. A parallel reality had been created and the first casualty was the truth. Imposing one’s views and discrediting legitimately elected Governments had worsened an already difficult regional situation. Support for certain terrorist groups could only lead to negative consequences, and fragmenting counter-terrorism efforts would only aggravate the problem. The only viable option was action based on Council decisions. Belarus had worked to enhance peace in its region, as a party to regional counter-terrorism agreements. Highlighting the importance of resolution 1540 (2004), he said Belarus in 2013 had held a workshop for the Commonwealth of Independent States to exchange information on that text.

    AURELIA FRICK, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Liechtenstein, said that for decades, conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa had deeply affected the lives and livelihoods of the people. In recent years, new waves of violence had contributed to a humanitarian crisis and displacement not seen since the Second World War. The terrorist threats in and emanating from the area had reached unprecedented levels. The reasons for the dramatic state of affairs were highly complex, she said, stressing that the war in Syria in particular could be seen as a failure of preventive diplomacy. The agreement on Iran’s nuclear programme should pave the way for greater collaboration on other strategic issues affecting the region. The conflicts in the region were set against complex historic backgrounds and geopolitical alliances, she said, urging Council members to pledge not to leave civilians under attack to their fate. The conflicts were also marked by extreme levels of impunity, the fight against which should be made a building block of international efforts.

    TZIPI HOTOVELY, Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs of Israel, said that her country had long been the subject of terror campaigns. Now that the Middle East and North Africa were experiencing a broad expansion of terror, Israel was flanked by terror groups on all its frontiers: Hizbullah and Jabhat al-Nusra in the north, ISIL-Sinai in the south, and Hamas in Gaza, which last year had launched thousands of missiles against civilian targets while tunnelling under the border. Israel, she said, dealt with that huge security threat while scrupulously abiding by international humanitarian law, and Hamas turned those principles on their head through the use of human shields. Unapologetic clarity was needed in the fight against terror. Israel’s commitment to the rule of law and democracy allowed its foes to use its principles against it, but democracy would always prevail through a fierce conviction to do battle with any or all those who strove to defile the sanctity of human life.

    ALBERT KOENDERS, Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, associating with the European Union, said terrorism, propelled into people’s lives by the power of social media and Internet networks, had no boundaries, moral or geographic. Terrorist organizations were challenging the beliefs and values of all peoples. The international community needed to act collectively against those who enslaved women and children, beheaded innocent civilians and destroyed cultural heritage. The number of foreign terrorist fighters was rising and they came from a variety of backgrounds and countries.

    Unlike the terrorists, he said, the international community acted in clear recognition of the moral and legal boundaries set by the rule of law and human rights. It took due account of the dilemmas posed by the demands for security and privacy. Finding the proper balance was not easy, but the Netherlands was convinced that the two were not mutually exclusive. The United Nations could be effective when it came together in demonstration of political will.

    PETER VARGHESE, Secretary of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade of Australia, said the causes of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and others in Libya and Yemen, were “diabolically” complex. The need for an international response was most urgent in Iraq and Syria. Australia was not immune to such problems, with some 120 Australian citizens having travelled to the Syria-Iraq conflict zone, many to fight for Da’esh. As part of the international coalition, Australia had extended air operations to target Da’esh in Syria, building on its operations in Iraq and consistent with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. The Russian Federation’s plan to carry out air strikes in Syria must focus on Da’esh. He supported Iraq in seeking to deliver inclusive governance and advocated a political solution in Syria.

    Sc30sep.a46 – bill eosbf

    GUNNAR BRAGI SVEINSSON, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Iceland, surveying the grave deterioration in the region, said that his country was determined to do its part in helping to address the humanitarian aspects of what he called a “man-made catastrophe”. Aid could alleviate the desperation that drove so many people into the hands of traffickers. He urged members of the Security Council to put differences aside and act in a united manner to help foster political solutions to the crises of the region.

    ABDULAZIZ ABDULRAHMAN ALAMMAR, Permanent Observer of the Gulf Cooperation Council, called for resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which he maintained was fuelling terrorism in the region. The Gulf States had provided billions in relief to Syrians and were committed to the country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. He called on the Security Council to help bring about a political solution. In Yemen, a settlement was also urgently needed and should be based on the Gulf Council’s plan and Security Council resolutions. Conflict and terror must end throughout the region.

    PAUL RICHARD GALLAGHER, Secretary for Relations with States of the Holy See, recalling Pope Francis’ address to the General Assembly on 25 September, reiterated his appeals for relief for those in the Middle East and Africa who were under the threat of death and the destruction of their cultural and religious heritage. He called on the international community not to remain silent and inert before all the tragedies happening at present. He echoed the pleas of Syrians for humanitarian assistance. A negotiated settlement in Syria must be a top priority; flooding the area with weapons would not help. Any solution must be based on the inviolable dignity of all persons regardless of religion or cultural differences. It was intolerable to stand by as fellow humans were persecuted, exiled, killed, burned and beheaded solely because they held different beliefs or belonged to minority groups.

    SERGIY KYSLYTSYA, Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, said that given the presence of militants and terrorists from the Russian Federation in Ukraine, some provisions of resolutions 2170 (2014) and 2178 (2014) were relevant to the situation in that country. Deeply concerned about ISIL in the Middle East and North Africa, he condemned mass violence crimes by that group, particularly in Syria and Iraq. The fight against such groups must be accompanied by a political transformation in Syria and democratization of its institutions. Combatting the activities of individual terrorists and groups would be insufficient if the problem of sponsor States was not addressed. There were disturbing attempts to tilt discussion on the Syrian crisis towards how to accommodate the Russian Federation’s interests in that country, rather than addressing the root causes of that dispute.

    AIZAZ AHMAD CHAUDHRY, Foreign Secretary of Pakistan, said the Middle East Spring had become the autumn of despair. The Palestine issue was the primary cause of instability in the Middle East. He advocated the creation of a viable Palestinian State based on 1967 borders with Al-Quds Al-Sharif as its capital. On Syria, he urged uniting behind the Special Envoy’s mediation efforts. In Yemen, the Government must be restored through negotiations, while a peace process must start, based on Council resolutions. If the United Nations could not guarantee the right to self-determination, he asked, who would?

    MILORAD ŠĆEPANOVIĆ, Vice-Minister for Foreign Affairs and European Integration of Montenegro, said mediation was an under-used conflict resolution tool, noting that his country would host a 2016 conference on mediation in the Mediterranean region. The absence of a political solution and humanitarian response had had a devastating effect on Syrian refugees. The Syrian crisis was the reason why mass atrocity cases must be tackled with more decisiveness by the Council. On the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, key actors should bring both sides back to the negotiation table. The parameters of a peace package for a two-State solution were already in place. In Libya and Yemen, stability required inclusive reconciliation Governments and strengthening the security sectors with international support. To counter incitement to terrorism, he urged religious leaders to more forcefully denounce terrorist claims that abused the values of Islam.

    ABDALLAH Y. AL-MOUALLIMI (Saudi Arabia) said the root causes of conflict in the Middle East and North Africa included domination, exclusion and a lack of international law, citing Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory and aggression against the Al-Aqsa mosque. The international community must immediately end Israeli occupation of Palestine and other Arab territories. He supported the creation of a Palestinian State with East Jerusalem as its capital. Peace in Syria required a broad coalition to address the deep causes of conflict. The Assad regime could not be part of the war against terrorism because it represented terrorism.

    He expressed deep concern about the Russian Federation’s military operations in Homs, where there were no Da’esh troops. Those attacks had claimed civilian victims and he demanded that they end immediately and not be repeated. Interference in State affairs, such as what Iran had done, were doomed to fail. He supported measures adopted by the Iraqi Government to restore balance in political life. In Yemen, Saudi Arabia had responded to the Government’s appeal. Resolution of that conflict required dialogue among the various parties, in line with the Gulf Cooperation Council mechanism and Security Council resolution 2216 (2015). It was reprehensible that Iran tried to politicize the incident during the Haj pilgrimage. Saudi Arabia had always sought to ensure pilgrims’ safety, having thwarted Iranian sabotage attempts.

    ASOKE KUMAR MUKERJI (India) called for the Council to invest more in political efforts to resolve the multiple conflicts in the region under discussion, including the civil war in Syria, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the intensified militia warfare in Libya and the worsening situation in Yemen. The prerogative of national authorities to resolve internal crises should be respected as a cardinal principle. Intervention, using humanitarian concerns as a pretext, ran the danger of exacerbating conflict. Pledging his country’s full cooperation in efforts to counter terrorism, he called on the Council to be more transparent in that area. In that context, he hoped that Council reform, to make it more effective and representative, would soon occur.

    ABDERRAZZAK LAASSEL (Morocco), underlining the importance of resolving conflicts peacefully with respect for the sovereignty of nations, criticized Israeli practices in Jerusalem that did not respect the sensitivities of hundreds of millions of Muslims and reiterated support for the two-State solution. Surveying the grave harm done by terrorist groups in the Middle East and North Africa, he said that despair was driving such terrorism as well as migration. He denounced all terrorism as criminal, affirming Morocco’s engagement in the fight against it and describing initiatives to which the country subscribed.

    HIROSHI MINAMI (Japan) stressed the need for not only confronting the challenges at hand in the region but also for addressing their underlying factors. Japan had been swift and steadfast in its response to the current refugee crisis, providing $810 million in assistance this year to refugees and internally displaced persons of Syria and Iraq. In addition, $2.5 million in assistance would be extended to European countries such as Serbia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, which also were receiving refugees. Japan reaffirmed its unwavering commitment to tackle terrorism through a multifaceted approach that included the empowerment of individuals and the building of economic communities in line with the concept of human security. He urged the Council to play an increasingly constructive role in achieving political solutions that the region ultimately needed.

    KINGSLEY MAMABOLO (South Africa), noting that previous approaches to violence and terrorism in the Middle East and North Africa had not produced the desired results, said that on the contrary, interference by outside parties and the pursuit of regime change had, instead, played a significant role in perpetuating instability. It was clear that the Council must be at the forefront of efforts to curb violent extremism and engage with all stakeholders, including regional organizations, and utilize local expertise. He called on the Council to redouble its efforts to promote conditions for inclusive dialogue aimed at political solutions to all conflicts in the region, including the one between Israelis and Palestinians and those in Syria, Libya and Yemen.

    HAHN CHOONGHEE (Republic of Korea) said that in the many worrisome and even terrifying developments in the Middle East and North Africa, key stakeholders needed to clarify common strategies and priorities. It was time to move beyond differences on the Syrian conflict and ISIL. Political transitions in Yemen and Libya should be inclusive, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict must not be put on the back burner. Welcoming the agreement on the Iranian nuclear programme, he said that the best weapon to fight terrorism should be the commitment to human rights, freedom and the rule of law.

    Taking the floor a second time, Iran’s representative said comments by his counterpart from Israel were irrelevant to today’s debate. Foreign occupation was the gravest form of terrorism. There was no doubt that that regime was responsible for oppression, civilian deaths, genocide and war crimes, as well as for turning millions of Palestinians into refugees. Its State terrorism had created deadly oppression around the world.

    To comments by Saudi Arabia’s representative, he said aggression against Yemen had created a “bleeding sore” in the region, inflicting death on civilians and emboldening extremist groups. Those unleashing their armies against innocent people in Yemen must realize that there was no way forward other than broad Yemeni dialogue. The world had not forgotten that delegation’s complicity in Al-Qaida and the Taliban, as well as in Saddam Hussein’s crimes against the Iranian and Iraqi people.

    On the hajj tragedy, he said Iran was not trying to politicize the issue. “We are talking about the lives of hundreds of people who were the victims of incompetence by those in charge,” he said. Many of the missing had not been identified and the return of bodies to their families had been delayed. He asked public opinion to demand that Saudi Arabia fulfil its international obligations, and more importantly, that conditions be prepared for a professional investigation into the causes of that disaster and ways to prevent future ones.

    The representative of Syria, responding to statements by the representative of Saudi Arabia, said that that country played a role in arming and facilitating terrorist groups. Without that support, the terrorist threat to Syria would have been eliminated long ago.

    0 0

    Source: Famine Early Warning System Network
    Country: Afghanistan, Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Honduras, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Mali, Mauritania, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Senegal, Somalia, South Sudan, Tajikistan, Togo, Uganda, Western Sahara, World

    Dryness worsens in Ethiopia and coastal West Africa

    Africa Weather Hazards

    1. Below-average rainfall over several bimodal areas of Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana, Togo, Benin, and Nigeria has led to a rapid increase in moisture deficits and a degradation of ground conditions. Reduced rainfall is expected during in the region during lateSeptember.

    2. While the recent increase in precipitation has led to more favorable ground conditions, a delayed onset and uneven rainfall distribution during the June-September season may negatively impact cropping and pastoral conditions in the region.

    3. Poorly distributed rainfall has resulted in drought, which has severely impacted ground conditions and led to livestock death across parts of north-central and eastern Ethiopia.

    4. Below-average rainfall since August has led to increased moisture deficits in several provinces in southern South Sudan and northern Uganda. Below-average rainfall is forecast in the region during the upcoming week.

    0 0

    Source: World Bank
    Country: Afghanistan, Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Ethiopia, Guinea, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, Nigeria, occupied Palestinian territory, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Turkey, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, World, Yemen

    The Annual Report is prepared by the Executive Directors of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Development Association (IDA)--collectively known as the World Bank--in accordance with the by-laws of the two institutions. The President of the IBRD and IDA and the Chairman of the Board of Executive Directors submits the Report, together with the accompanying administrative budgets and audited financial statements, to the Board of Governors.

    “World Bank. 2015. The World Bank Annual Report 2015. Washington, DC. © World Bank. License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.”


    0 0

    Source: Institute for Security Studies
    Country: Afghanistan, Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Mali, Nigeria, Somalia, Sudan, Tunisia, World

    Jakkie Cilliers


    This paper presents an overview of large-scale violence by Islamist extremists in key African countries. The paper builds on previous publications of the Institute for Security Studies on the nexus between development and conflict trends, and it seeks to provide an overview of the evolution of the associated terrorism through quantitative and contextual analysis using various large datasets. The focus is on the development and links among countries experiencing the worst of this phenomenon, especially Algeria, Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Mali, Nigeria and Somalia, as well as the impact of events in the Middle East on these African countries.

    0 0

    Source: Famine Early Warning System Network
    Country: Niger

    Situation à Diffa continue à rester préoccupante

    Key Messages

    • A la faveur de l’amélioration significative de la situation pluviométrique, les cultures en place présentent de bons aspects végétatifs qui se caractérisent par l’apparition de la maturité observée surtout au niveau des cultures de rente. Le niébé et les autres produits de cueillette augmentent la disponibilité alimentaire pour les ménages agricoles.

    • On peut toutefois remarquer dans les zones agricole et agropastorale de Ouallam (Tillabéri), et de Goure et Dungass (Zinder) que le Stress (Phase 2 de l’IPC) insécurité alimentaire aiguë persiste en septembre 2015. Pour ces zones tout comme pour les autres, les récoltes des produits céréaliers et de rente vont améliorer la disponibilité alimentaire et l’accès entre octobre et décembre 2015.

    • Les conditions de pâturages et d’abreuvement se sont significativement améliorées depuis mi-juillet. Ils se manifestant par un bon état d’embonpoint des animaux dont la valeur marchande est supérieur à sa moyenne en septembre permettant aux ménages éleveurs de bénéficier de termes d’échanges bétail/produits de consommation qui leur sont significativement favorables. Dans les zones pastorale, la situation se caractérise par une insécurité alimentaire Minimale (Phase 1 de l’IPC) jusqu’en décembre 2016 sauf à Abalak où l’insécurité alimentaire en Phase 2 (Phase 2 de l’IPC) persiste jusqu’en fin septembre 2015.

    • Dans la région de Diffa, l’impact de la crise sécuritaire par la perturbation persistante des sources du bien-être socioéconomique des ménages dont la satisfaction des besoins alimentaires continue d’être fortement dépendante des assistances humanitaires. Cette situation va continuer à dominer la sécurité alimentaire des ménages locaux et déplacées de la zone où l’insécurité alimentaire en Crise (Phase 3 de l’IPC) et en Stresse ! (Phase 2 ! de l’IPC) 2 va persister.

    Pour plus de détail, voir le Mise à jour sur la sécurité alimentaire de août.​

    0 0

    Source: UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
    Country: Algeria, Libya, Mali, Niger, Nigeria

    0 0

    Source: UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
    Country: Niger

    0 0

    Source: UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
    Country: Niger

    0 0

    Source: UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
    Country: Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Gambia, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal

    0 0

    Source: International Committee of the Red Cross
    Country: Mali

    Plus de 258 000 personnes vivant dans les régions de Tombouctou et Gao dans le nord du Mali ont reçu des vivres lors d'une vaste opération de distribution organisée par le CICR en collaboration avec la Croix-Rouge malienne. Ces activités se sont déroulées de juin à septembre 2015.

    Malgré l'accalmie observée ces derniers jours, la situation humanitaire reste préoccupante dans le nord du Mali. « A cause de l'insécurité et la période de soudure qui a commencé plus tôt que prévu, ces populations n'arrivent pas à satisfaire leurs besoins alimentaires essentiels », affirme Jean-Pierre Nereyabagabo, coordinateur des programmes de sécurité économique du CICR au Mali. « Par ailleurs, le nombre de ménages en insécurité alimentaire a nettement augmenté dans ces régions, en raison des mauvaises récoltes des cultures pluviales telles que le sorgho et le mil l'année dernière ».

    Les populations des communes de Bara, Ansongo et Boura dans la région de Gao, des cercles de Tombouctou, Goundam, Niafounké et Léré, ainsi que la commune de Salaam dans la région de Tombouctou ont reçu du riz, de la semoule de blé, des haricots, de l'huile et du sel. « C'est un grand soulagement pour nous. Nos réserves de nourriture étaient quasiment épuisées. En raison de l'insécurité et du manque d'opportunités économiques, nous n'avions même pas la possibilité d'aller dans nos champs ou de trouver du travail journalier rémunéré», explique l'une des bénéficiaires.

    Des semences ont également été distribuées aux agriculteurs vulnérables. « Afin d'éviter qu'ils ne consomment ces semences, ils ont aussi reçu de la nourriture pour 4 mois », précise M. Nereyabagabo.

    « Le dialogue avec les groupes armés et les autres parties prenantes sur le terrain nous permet de reprendre des activités d'envergure dans tout le nord du pays », explique Christoph Luedi, chef de la délégation du CICR au Mali. Depuis début avril en effet, l'insécurité avait contraint le CICR à réduire ses mouvements. « Nous espérons que les conditions demeureront favorables pour poursuivre nos activités en faveur des personnes les plus vulnérables dans l'ensemble de ces régions », conclut M. Luedi.

    Informations complémentaires :
    Valery Mbaoh Nana, CICR Bamako, tél. : +223 76 99 63 75
    Claire Kaplun, CICR Genève, tél. : +41 22 730 31 49 ou +41 79 244 64 05

older | 1 | .... | 439 | 440 | (Page 441) | 442 | 443 | .... | 728 | newer